Tokens_createRestrictedDataToken

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It reveals that execution happens in the user's Kuudo deployment and that an RDT is returned, but it does not clarify side effects, required permissions, failure modes, token properties, or restrictions on resources. This is a meaningful but incomplete behavioral picture.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and mostly readable, but 'Catalog entry' is filler and the second sentence is oddly placed. The core purpose is stated clearly, yet the front-loaded boilerplate reduces the efficiency of the message.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the absent annotations, empty schema, and missing output schema, the description is too thin. It does not explain what a restricted resource consists of, how restricted resources should be provided, what the returned token format is, or what 'runs in your Kuudo deployment' implies for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema is empty with additionalProperties: true, so there are no formal parameter definitions to rely on. The description adds that the RDT is for 'one or more restricted resources that you specify,' which gives vague semantic meaning, but it does not specify parameter names, shapes, or how resources should be identified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool returns a Restricted Data Token (RDT) for one or more specified restricted resources, which conveys the core function. It is distinguishable from the long list of Shipping, Fulfillment, and other sibling tools, though it does not explicitly name an alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance about when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or contexts where it should not be used. The phrase 'Runs in your Kuudo deployment, not here' is a signal but does not explain how that affects invocation or selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.