FinancesV0_listFinancialEvents

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It reveals that the tool returns financial events, but it does not mention whether the operation is read-only, whether pagination applies, what authentication or prerequisites are needed, or what the environment note ('not here') means for execution.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and mostly free of filler. The 'Catalog entry' and 'Runs in your Kuudo deployment, not here' phrases may add relevant context, though their exact meaning is unclear. Overall, it is appropriately short for the limited information it conveys.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema, no annotations, and no parameter schema, the description needs to provide more operational context. It omits important details such as date range format, pagination behavior, response shape, and how this tool relates to the other financial-event listing tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema declares zero properties, yet the description refers to a 'specified data range' without revealing how that range is passed. Since additionalProperties is true, the agent has no reliable parameter names or formats. This mismatch between description and schema undermines correct invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the operation ('Returns financial events') and the resource ('financial events') and implies a date-range scoping that distinguishes it from the ByGroupId and ByOrderId sibling tools. However, the opening 'Catalog entry. Runs in your Kuudo deployment, not here' introduces ambiguity about whether the tool is actually invokable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives almost no guidance on when to choose this tool over siblings like FinancesV0_listFinancialEventsByGroupId or FinancesV0_listFinancialEventsByOrderId. The note 'Runs in your Kuudo deployment, not here' hints at environment constraints but does not say what contexts warrant using this tool or what alternatives exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.