Orders_getOrderRegulatedInfo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states that regulated information is returned and that execution happens elsewhere. It does not disclose read-only behavior, response format, authorization requirements, or what 'regulated information' includes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is short, but the opening 'Catalog entry' is filler, and the environment warning is ambiguous. The core return statement is clear but could be front-loaded without the confusing prefix.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and an empty input schema, an agent lacks essential information: how to specify the order, what data will be returned, and what authorization is needed. The statement 'Runs in your Kuudo deployment, not here' even suggests the operation is not available in the current context. This is not safely callable based on the description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema exposes no properties, so the description is the only source for the implied 'order you specify'. It does not name the order identifier or explain how the order is selected, leaving an agent to guess. The empty schema with additionalProperties: true makes this especially unclear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The core sentence 'Returns regulated information for the order that you specify' names a concrete verb, resource, and object. 'Regulated information' also distinguishes it from sibling order reads like Orders_getOrder and Orders_getOrderItems. However, the prefatory 'Catalog entry' and environment remark muddy the purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling order-related endpoints. No alternatives are named, and no conditions or prerequisites are provided. The phrase 'Runs in your Kuudo deployment, not here' hints at an environment restriction but does not tell an agent when to invoke this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.