AplusContent_searchContentDocuments

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states that the tool returns a list of documents and metadata, but does not disclose pagination, authorization requirements, read-only guarantees, or any side effects. The phrase 'Runs in your Kuudo deployment, not here' adds an unexplained environmental behavior rather than clarifying execution semantics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short, but the first sentence 'Catalog entry.' contributes little and is not front-loaded with the key action. The useful behavioral sentence comes second. It is concise but not optimally structured for quick agent parsing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema or annotations to compensate for the minimal prose. The description does not explain the response structure beyond 'list... including metadata,' nor does it clarify pagination, the meaning of 'selling partner,' or the significance of the 'Kuudo deployment' environment. For an agent to invoke this correctly, more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so there are no parameter semantics for the description to clarify. The description adds useful context by specifying that the returned documents are those 'assigned to a selling partner,' which is meaningful even with an empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The core function is stated with a specific verb and resource: 'Returns a list of all A+ Content documents, including metadata, that are assigned to a selling partner.' This distinguishes it from create/update/get singular content document tools among siblings. However, the opening 'Catalog entry' and the environment note 'Runs in your Kuudo deployment, not here' inject ambiguity about whether this is an executable tool or a catalog placeholder.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus sibling AplusContent tools such as searchContentPublishRecords or getContentDocument. The deployment statement is a constraint, not a usage criterion, and no alternatives or exclusion conditions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.