text_reverse_text

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description mentions preserving formatting and statistics but does not disclose behavioral traits like input expectations (open schema) or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences; first sentence is redundant (Menu ID), core content is clear, but pointer to describe_tool adds minor overhead.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks specification of input format, mode selection, or output details; relies on external describe_tool for completeness, which is insufficient for a standalone definition.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has no specified parameters (additionalProperties: true), so description adds meaning by listing reversal options, but fails to detail actual parameter names or structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool reverses text with multiple options (characters, words, lines, etc.), distinguishing it from other text transformation tools like case_converter or find_replace.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; usage is implied for text reversal needs, but no exclusions or comparisons to siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.