math_bitwise_calculator

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states computational operations and output formats but does not address side effects, authentication, rate limits, or whether the tool is read-only. As a calculator, mutation is unlikely, but this is not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with 'Bitwise Calculator.' It lists operations and widths efficiently. However, the line 'Menu ID: bitwise_calculator.' is redundant given the tool name. Overall, it is concise with minimal waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity (7 required params, no schema descriptions, no output schema, no annotations), the description is incomplete. It lacks parameter explanations, examples, and details on how to specify inputs like bases and width. The reliance on 'describe_tool' indicates a gap in completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so description must compensate. It mentions operation types and integer widths but does not explain individual parameters like 'aBase', 'bBase', or exact acceptable values for 'operation'. The description adds marginal meaning but is insufficient for the 7 required parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly identifies the tool as a bitwise calculator with specific operations (AND, OR, XOR, etc.) and integer widths (32/64-bit, signed/unsigned). No sibling tool performs bitwise operations, so it is well-differentiated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lists capabilities but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or when to avoid it. The mention of 'Use describe_tool...' suggests the agent may need additional information, but it does not give explicit usage context or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.