Skip to main content
Glama
Jambozx

OnlineCyberTools MCP (280+ filterable tools)

encoding_decoding_railfence

Read-onlyIdempotent

Encode or decode text with the Rail Fence transposition cipher, arranging characters in a zigzag across rails. Designed for puzzles, CTFs, and educational use.

Instructions

Rail Fence Cipher (Encode / Decode). Encode or decode text with the classical Rail Fence cipher: characters are written in a zigzag down and up across a fixed number of rails, then read off row by row to encode (decode reverses the zigzag to recover the original order). This is a transposition cipher — it reorders characters rather than substituting them — and has no real cryptographic strength, so use it for puzzles, CTFs, and learning, not to protect secrets. Choose encoding_decoding_caesar or encoding_decoding_vigenere instead when you need a substitution cipher (fixed shift or keyword-driven), and pick this tool when the requirement is specifically a zigzag/rail transposition. rails must be an integer 2-50; remove_spaces strips spaces before processing. Runs locally on the input you provide: read-only, non-destructive, contacts no external service, and is rate-limited. Returns the transformed text plus a character analysis and a visual zigzag pattern.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textYesThe text to transform. All characters are repositioned; nothing is dropped except spaces when remove_spaces is true.
operationYesWhether to encode (write the zigzag, read off by rail) or decode (rebuild the zigzag to recover the original order).
railsYesNumber of rails (rows) in the zigzag. Must be an integer 2-50. More rails increases scrambling but offers no real security.
remove_spacesNoStrip all spaces from the text before encoding/decoding. When false, spaces are kept and repositioned like any other character.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
successNoWhether the transform succeeded.
inputNoThe input text, echoed back.
operationNoThe operation performed (encode or decode).
railsNoThe number of rails applied (2-50).
remove_spacesNoWhether spaces were stripped before processing.
resultNoThe transformed (encoded or decoded) text.
analysisNoCharacter-distribution analysis of the plaintext.
patternNoVisual zigzag layout for display (first 50 characters).
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses behavioral traits beyond annotations: it runs locally, is read-only, non-destructive, contacts no external service, and is rate-limited. It also describes the return value (transformed text, character analysis, visual zigzag pattern). No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, well-structured, and front-loaded with the purpose. Every sentence adds value, and the information is presented in a logical order without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity, 100% schema coverage, and presence of annotations and output schema, the description is complete. It covers purpose, usage, behavior, parameters, return values, and alternatives adequately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds some context (e.g., 'rails must be an integer 2-50'), but this is already in the schema. Minimal additional value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it is a Rail Fence cipher for encoding/decoding, explains the zigzag mechanism, and distinguishes it from other ciphers. It specifies the verb 'Encode or decode' and the resource 'Rail Fence cipher', making the purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicit guidance is given: use this tool for zigzag transposition, and choose Caesar or Vigenere for substitution ciphers. It also states the tool is for puzzles, CTFs, and learning, not for protecting secrets, providing clear when-not-to-use advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Jambozx/onlinecybertools-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server