crypto_password_strength_bulk

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations available. The description lists analysis aspects (entropy, crack-time, etc.) but lacks key behavioral traits like batch behavior (despite 'bulk' in name), performance, or prerequisites. Relies on describe_tool for more details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively short but includes an unnecessary 'Menu ID' and outsources guidance to describe_tool. It is front-loaded with key purpose but could be more concise by removing the Menu ID.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with potential batch processing and multiple analysis factors, the description is incomplete. No output schema, and the 'bulk' functionality is not explained. The referral to another tool for full context is a significant gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% with no parameter descriptions. The description adds no meaning beyond parameter names; 'commonWords' is unexplained. The tool name suggests bulk but schema only accepts one password, creating confusion.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool does 'Password Strength Analysis' with specific methods, but does not clarify the 'bulk' aspect or differentiate from the sibling tool 'crypto_password_strength'. It also refers to describe_tool for full guidance, indicating incompleteness.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool over alternatives or any exclusions. It only suggests using describe_tool for full guidance, essentially deferring the decision.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.