uninstall_hda

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry full behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Uninstall from the current session' without explaining whether the operation is reversible, destructive, or restricted. It does not disclose error behavior or impact on other HDAs, which is a significant gap for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that directly states the tool's core function. No filler or redundancy. It is appropriately concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool is a destructive/uninstall operation with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It lacks information about error handling prerequisites, and the exact implications of removing an HDA from the current session, making it risky for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the only parameter (file_path). The description adds minimal meaning by indicating 'HDA file' but does not clarify expected format, whether it is a file system path or asset name, or how it relates to installed HDAs. It does not compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Uninstall'), the resource ('an HDA file'), and the scope ('from the current session'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like hda_install, hda_create, and update_hda.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by naming the action, but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, side effects, or conditions under which uninstalling is appropriate, despite several HDA-related sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.