Skip to main content
Glama
idea-base-mcp-server

idea-base-mcp-server

Official

create_task

Create a new project task with details like title, dates, priority, assignee, and GitHub issue/PR links, then return its ID for tracking and follow-up updates.

Instructions

Create a new task in a project. Returns the created task with its ID.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "project_id": "<project_id>",
      "title": "<title>"
    },
    "name": "create_task"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
titleYesTitle of the task
due_dateNoDate the task is due, as YYYY-MM-DD.
priorityNoPriority level (0-5, higher is more important)
project_idYesThe ID of the project to add the task to
sort_orderNoPosition among the project's tasks (lower sorts first). NOT wired on the REST create path — POST /api/projects/:id/tasks always assigns MAX(sort_order)+1 and ignores this field on create. Set it after creation with update_task instead.
start_dateNoDate work is planned to start, as YYYY-MM-DD.
descriptionNoDetailed description of the task
is_milestoneNoMark this task as a milestone, drawn differently on the Gantt view. NOT wired on the REST create path — POST /api/projects/:id/tasks does not accept this field; the column is left at its default (0). Set it after creation with update_task instead.
github_pr_urlNoURL of the GitHub Pull Request implementing this task. Used to fetch the PR diff for AI verification and to match incoming CI status (check_run/check_suite/workflow_run webhooks) back to this task.
parent_task_idNoMake this a SUBTASK of the given task. The parent must be in the same project, and a subtask cannot itself have subtasks (one level only). A parent with subtasks takes its status from them: any subtask in progress makes the parent in progress, and all subtasks done makes it ready to complete. AND IT HOLDS THE PARENT OPEN (GH #387): while this subtask is not done, marking the parent done is REFUSED with 403 OPEN_SUBTASKS — the roll-up used to be display-only and now has teeth. That is the point of filing an adjacent finding as a subtask rather than as a separate task. Re-parenting an existing task is update_task's parent_task_id.
github_issue_idNoThe GitHub issue number this task tracks, set at creation. LOAD-BEARING, not bookkeeping: session_heartbeats.task_id is NOT NULL and the heartbeat endpoint resolves a session's GitHub issue number to a task through tasks.github_issue_id — a task created for an issue without this set emits heartbeats that have nowhere to land and is invisible on the live agent board. To change or clear it on an EXISTING task, use update_task's github_issue_id (which also accepts null, to unlink).
assignee_user_idNoUser ID to assign the task to. Must be a member of the same account. Omit to leave the task unassigned. For a SECOND (or third, ...) assignee, do not call this again — use add_assignee after creation, since this field only ever sets a single owner at create time.
github_issue_urlNoFull URL of the GitHub issue this task tracks, set at creation. Set it alongside github_issue_id so the two cannot disagree.
estimated_minutesNoEstimated time to complete in minutes
verification_modeNoGate this task's own completion. "manual" (default) allows a plain status change to done. "ai_review" or "all" BLOCK marking the task done (403 VERIFICATION_REQUIRED) until ai_completion_score reaches 0.8 — run "Verify with AI" first. "ci_required" or "all" BLOCK it until a PR is linked (github_pr_url) with passing CI. Setting this arms a real check against your own future attempt to close the task.
required_ci_checksNoWhich named CI checks (matched case-insensitively as a substring of the check name) must pass for "ci_required"/"all" verification_mode to consider CI satisfied — e.g. ["build","test"]. Read by GET /api/tasks/:id/ci-status's resolveRequiredChecks (app/functions/api/tasks/[id]/ci-status.js:13-32), NOT by the GitHub webhook handler, which sets ci_status unconditionally from whichever single check/workflow event just arrived. Omit to leave unset (falls back to the project's own required_ci_checks, then to requiring every check). NOT wired on the REST create path — POST /api/projects/:id/tasks does not accept this field. Set it after creation with update_task instead.
acceptance_criteriaNoCriteria for task completion

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv2.7.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / github_issue_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The GitHub issue number this task tracks, set at creation. LOAD-BEARING, not bookkeeping: session_heartbeats.task_id is NOT NULL and the heartbeat endpoint resolves a session's GitHub issue number to a task through tasks.github_issue_id — a task created for an issue without this set emits heartbeats that have nowhere to land and is invisible on the live agent board. To change or clear it on an EXISTING task, use update_task's github_issue_id (which also accepts null, to unlink).",
      +  "type": [
      +    "number",
      +    "string"
      +  ]
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / github_issue_url
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Full URL of the GitHub issue this task tracks, set at creation. Set it alongside github_issue_id so the two cannot disagree.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / properties / parent_task_id / description
      Previous value: -"Make this a SUBTASK of the given task. The parent must be in the same project, and a subtask cannot itself have subtasks (one level only). A parent with subtasks takes its status from them: any subtask in progress makes the parent in progress, and all subtasks done makes it ready to complete."New value: +"Make this a SUBTASK of the given task. The parent must be in the same project, and a subtask cannot itself have subtasks (one level only). A parent with subtasks takes its status from them: any subtask in progress makes the parent in progress, and all subtasks done makes it ready to complete. AND IT HOLDS THE PARENT OPEN (GH #387): while this subtask is not done, marking the parent done is REFUSED with 403 OPEN_SUBTASKS — the roll-up used to be display-only and now has teeth. That is the point of filing an adjacent finding as a subtask rather than as a separate task. Re-parenting an existing task is update_task's parent_task_id."
  2. Changed6 schema fields changedv2.2.0
    • changedInput schema / properties / assignee_user_id / description
      Previous value: -"User ID to assign the task to. Must be a member of the same account. Omit to leave the task unassigned."New value: +"User ID to assign the task to. Must be a member of the same account. Omit to leave the task unassigned. For a SECOND (or third, ...) assignee, do not call this again — use add_assignee after creation, since this field only ever sets a single owner at create time."
    • addedInput schema / properties / github_pr_url
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "URL of the GitHub Pull Request implementing this task. Used to fetch the PR diff for AI verification and to match incoming CI status (check_run/check_suite/workflow_run webhooks) back to this task.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / is_milestone
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Mark this task as a milestone, drawn differently on the Gantt view. NOT wired on the REST create path — POST /api/projects/:id/tasks does not accept this field; the column is left at its default (0). Set it after creation with update_task instead.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / required_ci_checks
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Which named CI checks (matched case-insensitively as a substring of the check name) must pass for \"ci_required\"/\"all\" verification_mode to consider CI satisfied — e.g. [\"build\",\"test\"]. Read by GET /api/tasks/:id/ci-status's resolveRequiredChecks (app/functions/api/tasks/[id]/ci-status.js:13-32), NOT by the GitHub webhook handler, which sets ci_status unconditionally from whichever single check/workflow event just arrived. Omit to leave unset (falls back to the project's own required_ci_checks, then to requiring every check). NOT wired on the REST create path — POST /api/projects/:id/tasks does not accept this field. Set it after creation with update_task instead.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / sort_order
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Position among the project's tasks (lower sorts first). NOT wired on the REST create path — POST /api/projects/:id/tasks always assigns MAX(sort_order)+1 and ignores this field on create. Set it after creation with update_task instead.",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / verification_mode
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Gate this task's own completion. \"manual\" (default) allows a plain status change to done. \"ai_review\" or \"all\" BLOCK marking the task done (403 VERIFICATION_REQUIRED) until ai_completion_score reaches 0.8 — run \"Verify with AI\" first. \"ci_required\" or \"all\" BLOCK it until a PR is linked (github_pr_url) with passing CI. Setting this arms a real check against your own future attempt to close the task.",
      +  "enum": [
      +    "manual",
      +    "ai_review",
      +    "ci_required",
      +    "all"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Changed4 schema fields changedv1.3.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / assignee_user_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "User ID to assign the task to. Must be a member of the same account. Omit to leave the task unassigned.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / due_date
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Date the task is due, as YYYY-MM-DD.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / parent_task_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Make this a SUBTASK of the given task. The parent must be in the same project, and a subtask cannot itself have subtasks (one level only). A parent with subtasks takes its status from them: any subtask in progress makes the parent in progress, and all subtasks done makes it ready to complete.",
      +  "type": "number"
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / start_date
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Date work is planned to start, as YYYY-MM-DD.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. First observedv1.2.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are supplied, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. Beyond stating that a task is created and the ID is returned, it says nothing about mutation semantics, required permissions, error conditions (e.g. 403 OPEN_SUBTASKS / VERIFICATION_REQUIRED), or the fact that several schema fields are silently ignored on the REST create path.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with the core purpose front-loaded and zero filler. It is efficient, though for a 17-parameter mutation tool the terseness borders on under-specification rather than optimal density.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The schema is extremely rich and compensates for most of the description's thinness, and the create-only scope is clear. However, with no annotations and no output schema, the description should at minimum flag that many fields are ignored on create and that completion-gating fields arm real 403 checks — none of which appear here.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the field descriptions are unusually rich, documenting defaults, unwired fields, and cross-tool routing. The tool description adds no parameter meaning at all, so the baseline 3 for a fully covered schema is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ("Create a new task in a project") and adds a return expectation ("Returns the created task with its ID"). It is immediately distinguishable from the sibling update_task, though it never names that sibling explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and names no alternatives. All routing hints (use add_assignee for extra assignees, update_task for re-parenting, update_task to set non-wired fields) live in the schema field descriptions, not here.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.