Skip to main content
Glama
idea-base-mcp-server

idea-base-mcp-server

Official

Related Servers

Alternatives to idea-base-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Huly project management that enables AI assistants to manage issues, track time, update statuses, and more directly from your IDE.
      18 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for time tracking, project management, and AI-powered memory storage using semantic search. It enables users to log time, manage client billing, and capture shared or personal ideas through integrated tools and team collaboration features.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 36 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to a distinct resource+action, and the descriptions go out of their way to separate easily-confused pairs (add_comment vs add_work_note, log_time vs stop_working, add_assignee vs update_task's assignee_user_id). The remaining overlaps are mild: resume_working duplicates start_working's resume behavior by the author's own admission, and log_time / quick_log / stop_working all touch time recording, requiring careful reading to pick correctly.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Nearly every name is snake_case verb_noun with a predictable verb vocabulary (create_/get_/list_/update_/add_/remove_/set_/start_/stop_/pause_/resume_/close_), making resource and action readable at a glance. Deviations like quick_log, report_bug, and update_task_status are still idiomatic and unambiguous within the same convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    36 tools is heavy and sits above the comfortable band, but the domain genuinely spans products, projects, tasks, sprints, work sessions, assignments, verification, and support, so most tools earn a place. There is still consolidation headroom (log_time vs stop_working, resume_working vs start_working, record_verification_feedback), which pushes it to borderline rather than well-scoped.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows are covered end to end: product/project/task CRUD-ish surfaces, sprint lifecycle with cadence, measured work sessions, assignments, and AI verification. Notable gaps remain, though: no delete anywhere (tasks, projects, products, sprints), no update_product, no list_comments or way to read a task's comment thread, and no way to list or correct existing time entries other than the initial write.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessMixed handling