idea-base-mcp-server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to idea-base-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Huly project management that enables AI assistants to manage issues, track time, update statuses, and more directly from your IDE.18 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP Server to log time and view Jira statistics directly from Cursor IDE.ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI assistants in IDEs to interact with RefBase webapp for managing conversations, bugs, features, and project context via natural language.7 npm3Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for Kaiten kanban boards, enabling task management via AI assistants like Cursor and Claude Code.19 PyPI1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for Panel Todo — lets AI assistants manage your tasks, issues, and sprints directly in VS Code.388 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for time tracking, project management, and AI-powered memory storage using semantic search. It enables users to log time, manage client billing, and capture shared or personal ideas through integrated tools and team collaboration features.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 36 tools
Most tools map to a distinct resource+action, and the descriptions go out of their way to separate easily-confused pairs (add_comment vs add_work_note, log_time vs stop_working, add_assignee vs update_task's assignee_user_id). The remaining overlaps are mild: resume_working duplicates start_working's resume behavior by the author's own admission, and log_time / quick_log / stop_working all touch time recording, requiring careful reading to pick correctly.
Nearly every name is snake_case verb_noun with a predictable verb vocabulary (create_/get_/list_/update_/add_/remove_/set_/start_/stop_/pause_/resume_/close_), making resource and action readable at a glance. Deviations like quick_log, report_bug, and update_task_status are still idiomatic and unambiguous within the same convention.
36 tools is heavy and sits above the comfortable band, but the domain genuinely spans products, projects, tasks, sprints, work sessions, assignments, verification, and support, so most tools earn a place. There is still consolidation headroom (log_time vs stop_working, resume_working vs start_working, record_verification_feedback), which pushes it to borderline rather than well-scoped.
Core workflows are covered end to end: product/project/task CRUD-ish surfaces, sprint lifecycle with cadence, measured work sessions, assignments, and AI verification. Notable gaps remain, though: no delete anywhere (tasks, projects, products, sprints), no update_product, no list_comments or way to read a task's comment thread, and no way to list or correct existing time entries other than the initial write.