Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
Heartran

Kanka MCP Server

by Heartran
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

list_notes

List campaign notes with pagination and optional entry text, and filter records by empty or filled entries to keep responses small.

Instructions

List notes. Use per_page to keep responses small enough to be returned whole, and entry_filter to return only records whose entry is empty or filled.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageNoPage number (default 1).
entriesNoInclude full entry/entry_parsed text (default true). Set false to omit the long entry fields, shrink the response, and get a has_entry boolean per record instead.
per_pageNoRecords per page, 1-100. Enforced by this server, so it holds even when the Kanka API returns a different page size. Omit to return the API's own page untouched; when set (or when entry_filter is used) the default is 25 with entries, 100 without.
campaignIdYes
entry_filterNoKeep only records with an empty entry ('empty'), only records with text ('filled'), or all of them ('all', default). Filtering is applied across the whole collection, not just one API page.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv2.2.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / entries
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Include full entry/entry_parsed text (default true). Set false to omit the long entry fields, shrink the response, and get a has_entry boolean per record instead.",
+  "type": "boolean"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / entry_filter
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Keep only records with an empty entry ('empty'), only records with text ('filled'), or all of them ('all', default). Filtering is applied across the whole collection, not just one API page.",
+  "enum": [
+    "all",
+    "empty",
+    "filled"
+  ],
+  "type": "string"
+}
    • addedInput schema / properties / page / description
      Added value: +"Page number (default 1)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / per_page
      Added value: +{
+  "description": "Records per page, 1-100. Enforced by this server, so it holds even when the Kanka API returns a different page size. Omit to return the API's own page untouched; when set (or when entry_filter is used) the default is 25 with entries, 100 without.",
+  "maximum": 100,
+  "minimum": 1,
+  "type": "number"
+}
  2. First observedv2.1.1

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full disclosure duty. It does surface one genuinely useful behavioral trait: responses can apparently be truncated and per_page can prevent that. However it says nothing about result shape, ordering, or what a note record contains, and read-only nature is only implied by the verb "List".

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no filler, and the actionable advice is front-loaded after the purpose statement. The opener is thinner than it needs to be for a five-parameter tool, but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description would need to carry result-shape and scope information; it only partly does. For a straightforward campaign-scoped list tool this is adequate to call correctly, but not enough for an agent to know what it will receive back.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 80%, so the parameters are largely self-documenting and the baseline applies. The description restates per_page and entry_filter with a slightly new rationale (keeping responses small enough to be returned whole), but adds nothing on page, entries, or campaignId beyond what the schema already says.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The opening sentence pairs a specific verb with a specific resource ("List notes"), which is unambiguous about the operation. It does not differentiate from the sibling retrieval tools (get_note, search), so an agent must infer when listing beats searching.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives tuning advice for two parameters but never states when to use list_notes versus get_note or search, nor what preconditions exist (e.g., that campaignId is required). The one piece of conditional guidance — per_page for whole responses — is about invocation mechanics, not tool selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools