get_sdn_zone

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It identifies the operation as a read (non-destructive), but does not disclose behavior for invalid zone IDs, error handling, or potential side effects. The simple getter context makes some omissions acceptable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and to the point, with no superfluous information. It efficiently conveys the purpose and parameter. However, it could benefit from slightly more structure or examples.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, read operation, presence of output schema), the description is largely sufficient. It covers the essential what and the parameter. Additional details about the return value are not required due to the output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds 'Args: zone: Zone ID', providing basic semantics. However, it lacks details on format or allowed values, and there is only one parameter. This is adequate but minimal.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get SDN zone configuration' indicating a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_sdn_zones by implying retrieval of a single zone's config, but does not explicitly differentiate from other getters.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_sdn_zones or other getters. The description lacks any context about prerequisites or selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.