Proxmox MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Proxmox MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Proxmox VE infrastructure, including VMs, containers, storage, network, high availability, replication, SDN, and node administration.10015 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Proxmox VE virtual machines via MCP and OpenAPI, supporting operations like start, stop, clone, and snapshot.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to monitor and analyze Proxmox VE virtualization environments via the MCP protocol.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Proxmox VE that enables AI assistants to inspect and manage LXC containers, VMs, snapshots, and resource pools via the Proxmox API.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Proxmox VE infrastructure, including VMs, containers, storage, and cluster operations via natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to monitor and manage Proxmox VE infrastructure, including nodes, VMs, containers, storage, backups, and networking, via natural language.1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 286 tools
The resource/action prefixes help, but the scale creates overlapping lookalikes such as get_ha_status vs get_ha_manager_status, migrate_ha_resource vs relocate_ha_resource, and list_backup_file_restore vs list_file_restore. An agent selecting among 286 tools will frequently face ambiguous boundaries, even though many tools are individually distinct.
Most tools follow a clear list_/get_/create_/update_/delete_ + resource pattern, and related CRUD groups are easy to spot. However, there are notable deviations like vm_agent_exec, proxmox_api_raw, wakeonlan_node, and startall_node/stopall_node that break the otherwise predictable convention.
286 tools is far beyond a coherent MCP surface and exceeds any reasonable scope for fast and accurate tool selection. Even a comprehensive hypervisor API would be better served by consolidated endpoints or a smaller set of higher-level operations.
The server covers nearly every Proxmox VE domain with CRUD/lifecycle operations for VMs, containers, storage, users, HA, backups, SDN, firewall, and Ceph. Minor gaps exist, such as missing updates for some SDN/firewall alias resources and missing deletion for some Ceph objects, but the breadth and raw API fallback prevent major dead ends.