get_cluster_log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits fully. It only says 'recent events' and mentions max_entries, but omits output format, ordering, filtering, authentication, or side effects. This is insufficient for a tool among many similar ones.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short with one sentence and an argument line, but lacks a front-loaded summary. It is concise but could be more structured to include usage context without significant bloat.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite low complexity and presence of output schema, the description fails to define what constitutes the cluster log, its relationship to other logs (e.g., node journals), or how to effectively use the max_entries parameter. It lacks completeness for reliable tool selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so description must add meaning. It states 'max_entries: Max log entries' which only minimally clarifies the parameter's role. It does not mention the default value (50) or explain the meaning of 'max' (e.g., most recent). The value added over the schema is negligible.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the cluster log (recent events), using the verb 'get' and resource 'cluster log'. It is distinguishable from siblings like get_task_log or get_node_journal but does not explicitly differentiate them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool compared to alternatives, no prerequisites or exclusion criteria. The description only states what it does, not when to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.