List Bundle Registration

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description bears minimal responsibility. It adds no behavioral details beyond the name, but also does not contradict annotations. The description could mention that no modifications occur but is not required given the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of just four words. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, and contains no superfluous information. However, it could be slightly expanded to improve clarity without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's moderate complexity (2 optional parameters, output schema present) and the availability of many sibling list tools, the description is too sparse. It does not explain what a 'Share Link Registration' is, how it relates to bundles, or how the output might be used. This leaves significant gaps for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions (bundle_id and fields). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'List Share Link Registrations' clearly states the verb (List) and resource (Share Link Registrations), which is specific to the tool's purpose. However, it does not explicitly distinguish this tool from sibling tools like List_Bundle or List_Bundle_Notification, and the term 'Share Link Registration' may be confusing without further context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as List_Bundle or List_Bundle_Download. The description lacks any contextual clues about usage scenarios, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.