Delete File
Delete_FileDelete a file or folder at a specified path on Files.com.
Instructions
Delete File/Folder
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | No | Path to operate on. |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Delete_FileDelete a file or folder at a specified path on Files.com.
Delete File/Folder
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| path | No | Path to operate on. |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true, so description adds no extra behavioral context. It does not mention permission requirements, reversibility, or side effects beyond what annotations convey.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely brief (2 words) but lacks sufficient structure. While concise, it is under-specified and fails to provide useful information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity and presence of output schema, description omits important details like behavior when path does not exist or is a folder with contents. Leaves agent with ambiguities.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with description 'Path to operate on.' The tool description does not add any extra meaning (e.g., format or constraints). Baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description explicitly states verb 'Delete' and resource 'File/Folder'. It is clear and distinct from sibling tools like Copy_File or Move_File. However, it could be more specific (e.g., permanent deletion or move to trash).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions provided. Agent must infer usage context from the name alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Files-com/files-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server