divine_get_ritu_and_anaya

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the set of Hindu season names as likely output values, which is useful, but 'related calendar information' remains vague and no additional behavioral context (e.g., response shape, language behavior) is disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact, two sentences, and front-loaded with the core purpose. The season list adds concrete value without padding, and there is no redundant boilerplate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although an output schema exists, the description leaves 'Anaya' completely undefined and gives only a vague 'related calendar information' hint. It also fails to differentiate this panchang component from the many sibling tools, so an agent has insufficient context to reliably select it for the intended seasonal query.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description only says 'date and location,' while the actual schema expects seven distinct fields (day, month, year, place, lat, lon, tzone). With schema description coverage reported as 0%, the description does not compensate by explaining the required components of a valid call, leaving the agent to open the schema and infer mapping.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get') and resource ('Ritu (season) and Anaya details'), and even enumerates possible season names. However, it doesn't explain what 'Anaya' means or explicitly distinguish this tool from siblings like divine_get_panchang, which likely covers the same panchang domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided beyond saying it works 'for a given date and location.' The description never states when to prefer this tool over divine_get_panchang, divine_get_tithi, or other calendar-specific siblings, nor does it mention any exclusions or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.