divine_get_muhurat_house_entering

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that it returns 'auspicious dates in the month with muhurat details', but it does not disclose potential caveats such as empty results or precision limitations. This is acceptable but not exceptional.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is only two sentences and is appropriately front-loaded. The first sentence states the action, resource, and scope; the second summarizes the return value. There is no redundant filler or unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich input schema, clear annotations, and an output schema, the description is mostly complete for invoking the tool correctly. It clearly names the Griha Pravesh use case and its month/location scope. The only meaningful gap is the absence of explicit guidance about alternatives, but the schema handles the remaining invocation details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description mentions only 'month and location' and does little to explain the required parameters. With schema description coverage at 0%, it fails to compensate by clarifying year, lat, lon, tzone, lan, or the nested params object. The input schema itself has useful descriptions, but the tool description adds almost no parameter-level meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description begins with a specific verb and resource: 'Get the Griha Pravesh (house-entering) Muhurat'. It clearly identifies the ceremony type and scope, distinguishing it from sibling muhurat tools such as divine_get_muhurat_marriage or divine_get_muhurat_vehicle_purchase.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states the scope ('for a given month and location') and makes clear this is about house-entering muhurat, but it does not explicitly say when to choose this tool over the many sibling muhurat endpoints or mention any exclusions. The intended use is implied rather than directly contrasted with alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.