divine_get_lal_kitab_house_signification

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already convey readOnly=false? Wait, readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, destructiveHint=false, so safety is covered. The description adds 'Returns what...' which clarifies the output, but it doesn't describe any additional behavioral aspects like authentication, rate limits, or response variability. It is consistent with annotations and adds minimal context beyond purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short, front-loaded sentences with no fluff. The first sentence states the action, and the second clarifies the house range and what 'signification' entails. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a detailed schema, annotations, and an output schema present, the description is largely complete for calling the tool correctly. It could be improved by explicitly distinguishing it from sibling Lal Kitab tools, but the core purpose and return behavior are clear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so parameters are already well-documented. The description only references 'selected house' and 'given chart' without adding meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies because no extra parameter context is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Get the Lal Kitab signification of one house for a birth chart.' It further clarifies scope ('selected house (1-12)') and distinguishes from siblings like divine_get_lal_kitab_house_position by focusing on signification meaning rather than position.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by saying 'one house' and 'given chart', but it gives no explicit guidance on when to choose this tool over the many Lal Kitab siblings (e.g., house_position, planet_analysis, dasha). No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.