divine_get_jaimini_padas

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds useful context beyond annotations by clarifying that it covers all houses and by explaining the interpretive meaning of Arudha Padas. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly written sentences with no filler. The primary purpose is front-loaded, and the follow-up sentence adds meaningful interpretive context rather than redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the rich annotations, detailed nested input schema, and presence of an output schema, the description covers the core purpose and semantic meaning well. It lacks explicit usage guidance and parameter mapping, but those gaps are partly mitigated by the well-structured schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description provides no parameter guidance, and schema description coverage is 0% at the top-level 'params' field. Although the referenced KundliInput schema is itself detailed, the description does not compensate for the low coverage as required, leaving the agent to rely entirely on the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description states a specific verb ('Get'), a specific resource ('Jaimini Padas / Arudha Padas'), and scope ('for all houses in a birth chart'). It also provides the conceptual meaning, which distinguishes it from other Jaimini siblings like chara dasha or karakamsha lagna.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains what the tool does but gives no guidance on when to choose it over the many sibling astrological tools. There are no explicit alternatives, conditions, or exclusions mentioned, so an agent must infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.