wb_warehouse_update

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It merely says 'Update a seller warehouse' and does not state whether this mutates an existing record, what side effects occur, whether changes are reversible, or what errors/permissions are involved.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded, but the parenthetical '(обновить склад)' is a redundant translation that adds no value. It is not verbose, yet the brevity veers into under-specification rather than purposeful conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutating tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It fails to explain that warehouse_id identifies an existing warehouse, which fields can be updated, or how this relates to wb_warehouse_create and wb_warehouse_delete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not mention any of the parameters (warehouse_id, name, address). An agent gets no additional meaning beyond raw property names and types, so it cannot tell how the fields are applied or which values are valid.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly names the action ('Update') and the resource ('a seller warehouse'), which distinguishes it from sibling create, delete, and list warehouse tools. However, it gives no detail about the scope or nature of the update, so it stops short of a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool instead of wb_warehouse_create, wb_warehouse_delete, or wb_warehouses. The only context an agent can infer is from the generic verb 'Update', which is not enough to route correctly among related tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.