wb_warehouse_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It states that a warehouse is created but does not address permissions, response behavior, idempotency, or side effects. A bare verb is not enough to be behaviorally transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short, action-first sentence with no fluff. The Russian parenthetical is redundant but harmless, so it loses one point from perfect structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter create with no output schema, the description plus input schema is minimally sufficient to invoke the tool. It lacks guidance on return values, validation, or how it relates to warehouse-related sibling tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain 'name' or 'address'. The warehouse context weakly implies that address is a physical address, but the description adds no real meaning beyond the property names and does not compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the specific action (create) and resource (seller warehouse), and scopes it to FBS. This distinguishes it clearly from sibling tools like wb_warehouse_update, wb_warehouse_delete, and wb_warehouses.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The FBS scope implies when the tool applies, and the create/update/delete verb separates it from nearby siblings. However, there is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, nor mention of alternatives like wb_fbw_warehouses.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.