wb_tariffs_pallet

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral disclosure burden. It does not state whether this is a read-only lookup, how the optional date parameter affects results, what the response contains, or any limitations. The noun phrase conveys subject matter but no actual behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single compact phrase with no filler, and the key word 'pallet' is front-loaded. It is appropriately concise, though slightly under-structured as a noun phrase rather than a declarative statement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description minimally identifies the domain but leaves the return shape, date semantics, and selection criteria implicit. It is enough to recognize the tool's purpose, but not enough for an agent to fully predict the call's behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage for the single 'date' parameter with format YYYY-MM-DD, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning about how date is interpreted, but the schema already provides enough for basic invocation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the resource precisely: 'Pallet logistics tariffs for FBO.' The word 'pallet' distinguishes it from sibling tariff tools, but no explicit verb such as 'get' or 'list' is present, so it reads as a noun phrase rather than a fully specified operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to choose this tool versus alternatives like wb_tariffs_box, wb_tariffs_return, or wb_tariffs_commission. The only differentiator is the word 'pallet,' leaving the agent to infer selection context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.