zuckerbot_launch_portfolio

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must cover behavioral traits. It only states the tool is unavailable and must not create Meta objects, but does not explain what it does when operational, required permissions, side effects, or return values. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, front-loaded with key status information. However, the core purpose is missing, making it under-specified. Conciseness is good but at the expense of clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, no annotations, and the description lacks essential details about the tool's function and behavior. For a likely complex launch tool, the description is incomplete and does not provide enough context for an agent to understand its utility.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool is temporarily unavailable and directs to use an alternative, but does not clearly state what the tool itself does. The verb 'launch' is implied but not defined; the purpose is vague and overshadowed by the unavailability notice.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when not to use (during Dealify launch hardening) and provides an alternative tool (zuckerbot_launch_campaign). Also mentions creating a legacy-mode draft, giving clear context for usage despite the temporary unavailability.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.