createCraft

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing side effects and behaviors. It only states the action and creative guidance, omitting important details like prerequisites, persistence, required relationships, or what the response contains. This leaves significant behavioral aspects undisclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, with the core action front-loaded in the first sentence and practical AI guidance in the second. It is efficient and free of unnecessary fluff, achieving perfect conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex creation tool with 11 parameters (7 required) and no output schema or annotations, this description is insufficient. It fails to explain overall behavior, prerequisites like the existence of the world or population, return value, or side effects. The schema covers individual parameters but not the operational context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides thorough descriptions for all 11 parameters (100% coverage), placing the baseline at 3. The description adds slight value by instructing AI to generate creative names and descriptions, which guides the 'name' and 'description' parameters, but it does not further clarify the other parameters beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new craft/item/heritage object' with examples like magical items, weapons, books, artifacts, which identifies the action and resource specifically. This distinguishes it from sibling tools such as listWorlds or completeQuest, which have different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating new craft items and instructs AI to generate creative names/descriptions, but it does not explicitly discuss when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. The context is present but not detailed enough to provide clear exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.