etsy_shop_payment_summary
Get the payment account balance and summary for an Etsy shop by providing its shop ID.
Instructions
Get payment account balance and summary for a shop
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| shop_id | Yes |
Get the payment account balance and summary for an Etsy shop by providing its shop ID.
Get payment account balance and summary for a shop
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| shop_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, and the description ('Get') is consistent. No additional behavioral traits (e.g., authorization needs, rate limits) are disclosed beyond the annotation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence of 8 words, with no unnecessary content. It is maximally concise for conveying the basic purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has no output schema, and the description does not mention what the summary includes (e.g., balances, pending amounts). For a simple tool, the description lacks completeness about expected return content.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no extra meaning for the single parameter 'shop_id'. The agent gets no guidance on format, source, or constraints beyond the schema's type information.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('payment account balance and summary for a shop'), clearly stating the tool's action. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like etsy_payment_account_get or etsy_shop_get, which could cause confusion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools include payment- and shop-related tools, but the description provides no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BusyBee3333/etsy-mcp-2026-complete'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server