etsy_ledger_entry_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description 'Get' is consistent with the readOnlyHint annotation, so no contradiction. However, the description adds no behavioral details beyond what the annotation already provides (safe read operation). No extra context like data volume or authorization is given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (6 words), but conciseness sacrifices necessary detail. For a simple getter, it could be acceptable, but the lack of parameter semantics makes it under-specified. It is front-loaded but not well-rounded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and the need to understand what a ledger entry is, the description is incomplete. It does not mention related operations (e.g., listing entries first) or what the response contains. The tool is simple but the description could do more to set context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the JSON schema has no descriptions for 'shop_id' and 'ledger_entry_id'. The tool description does not compensate by explaining their meaning, format, or how to obtain them. This leaves the agent without parameter guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a specific ledger entry' clearly states the action (get) and the resource (specific ledger entry). It distinguishes from siblings like 'etsy_ledger_entries_list' which lists all entries, and 'etsy_payment_ledger_entry_get' which likely targets a different scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., etsy_ledger_entries_list) or what prerequisites are needed. It does not mention context such as requiring the ledger_entry_id from a list operation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.