etsy_listings_expired_list
List all expired listings for an Etsy shop to identify and manage items that need renewal.
Instructions
List all expired listings for a shop
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| offset | No | ||
| shop_id | Yes |
List all expired listings for an Etsy shop to identify and manage items that need renewal.
List all expired listings for a shop
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| limit | No | ||
| offset | No | ||
| shop_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description adds no behavioral context beyond the readOnlyHint annotation; does not mention pagination or response format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but lacks structure; omits critical parameter and usage details.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and many similar sibling tools, description is insufficient; missing pagination and data shape information.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to explain limit, offset, or shop_id parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'list', resource 'expired listings', and scope 'for a shop', distinguishing from siblings like active listings list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like etsy_listings_list or etsy_listings_inactive_list.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BusyBee3333/etsy-mcp-2026-complete'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server