Skip to main content
Glama

get_workspace_members

Read-only

List workspace members filtered by name, email, role, or status. Pagination support for browsing large teams.

Instructions

List members of the current workspace (filterable, paginated).

Optional filters first_name/last_name/email/display_name (case-insensitive contains), role_slug (exact), is_active, is_bot - combined with AND.

Args: cursor: Prior response's next_cursor; omit for first page. per_page: Results per page (1-1000, default 100). order_by: Sort field; prefix '-' for descending.

Returns: Paginated envelope: results (members incl. role, role_slug, is_active, is_bot) + total_count, next_cursor, next_page_results.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
emailNo
cursorNo
is_botNo
order_byNo
per_pageNo
is_activeNo
last_nameNo
role_slugNo
first_nameNo
display_nameNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
countYes
resultsYes
grouped_byNo
extra_statsNo
next_cursorYes
prev_cursorYes
total_countYes
total_pagesYes
total_resultsYes
sub_grouped_byNo
next_page_resultsYes
prev_page_resultsYes
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, and the description adds value by detailing filter behavior, pagination, and return structure, which goes beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, well-structured with Args and Returns sections, and every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema and the detailed explanation of return values (paginated envelope with member fields), the description is complete and informative.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 0% schema coverage, the description explains the purpose and behavior of key parameters (cursor, per_page, order_by) and filter fields with case-insensitivity and exact match details, adding meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists workspace members with filtering and pagination, distinguishing it from sibling tools like get_project_members.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context on how to use filters, pagination, and sorting, but does not explicitly state when not to use this tool versus alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Bl4nk44/plane-ce-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server