Lists all nodes in a Valkey cluster with role, address, health, and slot ranges. Detects when the instance is not running in cluster mode by returning an error.
Discover all nodes in the Valkey cluster — role (master/replica), address, health status, and slot ranges. Returns an error message if this instance is not running in cluster mode.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| instanceId | No | Optional instance ID override |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.33.0v0.31.0v0.20.2v0.20.1v0.16.0Input schema / additionalPropertiesRemoved value: -falsev1.0.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses the output fields (role, address, health, slots) and error condition. However, it does not explicitly state that the operation is read-only or safe, though this can be inferred.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences with no wasted words. The first sentence clearly states the action and output, the second adds an important error condition. Well-structured.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one optional parameter and no output schema, the description provides adequate context. It covers the tool's action, return values, and a key error case. Could be slightly more explicit about the return type (list), but sufficient.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (instanceId has a description). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool discovers nodes in a Valkey cluster, listing role, address, health, and slot ranges. This differentiates it from sibling tools like get_cluster_node_stats or get_cluster_slowlog, which focus on specific metrics or logs.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use for discovering cluster nodes and explicitly warns about error if not in cluster mode. It does not explicitly contrast with alternative tools, but the purpose is clear enough for an agent to decide when to call it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.