single_1
Retrieve specific Douyin video data to analyze content, track performance metrics, and gather platform insights for research or business purposes.
Instructions
single
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve specific Douyin video data to analyze content, track performance metrics, and gather platform insights for research or business purposes.
single
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure but offers none. It doesn't indicate whether this is a read or write operation, what permissions might be required, what side effects occur, or what the tool actually does beyond its name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While technically concise with just one word, this represents severe under-specification rather than effective conciseness. The description fails to provide any meaningful information that would help an AI agent understand or use the tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no annotations, no output schema, and a completely uninformative description, this is completely inadequate. The description provides no information about what the tool does, how it behaves, or what results to expect.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters with 100% schema description coverage, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description doesn't add parameter information, but this is appropriate given the complete absence of parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'single' is a tautology that merely restates the tool name without providing any meaningful information about what the tool does. It doesn't specify any verb, resource, or purpose, and offers no distinction from the numerous sibling tools listed.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool, when not to use it, or what alternatives might exist. There's no context about appropriate scenarios or prerequisites for invoking this tool.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/BACH-AI-Tools/bachai-douyin-api-new'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server