detail_7

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits, but 'detail' gives no information about what the tool does, its effects, permissions, rate limits, or output. This leaves the agent with no understanding of the tool's behavior beyond its name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While 'detail' is extremely concise, it is under-specified rather than efficiently structured. The single word fails to convey any meaningful information, making it ineffective as a description despite its brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and a vague description, this tool is completely inadequate for an AI agent. The description does not compensate for the missing context, leaving the tool's functionality and use cases entirely unclear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters with 100% coverage, so no parameter information is needed. The description does not add any param details, but since there are no parameters, this is acceptable, and the baseline score is 4 as per the rules for 0 parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'detail' is a tautology that merely restates the tool name, providing no specific verb or resource to clarify what the tool does. It fails to distinguish this tool from its many siblings (e.g., detail, detail_1, detail_2, etc.), leaving the purpose vague and unhelpful for an AI agent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as other 'detail' siblings or related tools like 'info' or 'item'. The description offers no context, exclusions, or implied usage scenarios, making it impossible for an agent to make an informed selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.