detail_1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. 'detail' gives no information about whether this is a read or write operation, what resources it affects, authentication needs, rate limits, or side effects. It fails to meet the burden of behavioral transparency for an unannotated tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While 'detail' is extremely brief, this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. A single word fails to convey necessary information, making it inefficient for the agent's understanding. It does not front-load key details or structure content helpfully.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and a vague description, the tool is severely incomplete. The description does not compensate for missing structured data, leaving the agent unable to understand the tool's purpose, behavior, or usage in a context with many similar siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters with 100% schema description coverage, meaning the schema fully documents the absence of inputs. The description adds no parameter information, but with no parameters, a baseline score of 4 is appropriate as there is nothing to compensate for.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'detail' is a tautology that merely restates the tool name without specifying what it does. It provides no verb, resource, or scope, and fails to distinguish it from sibling tools like 'detail_2' through 'detail_7' or 'detailid' and 'detailurl'. This offers no meaningful guidance on the tool's function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many similar-sounding sibling tools (e.g., 'detail_2' to 'detail_7'), there is no indication of context, prerequisites, or differentiation, leaving the agent with no usage direction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.