detailurl_1

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden but offers zero behavioral disclosure. It doesn't indicate if this is a read/write operation, what it returns, error conditions, or any system constraints. The single-word description fails to add any meaningful context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While technically concise with one word, this is under-specification rather than effective brevity. The description fails to convey necessary information, making it inefficient despite its short length—it doesn't earn its place by adding value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is completely inadequate given the context. With no annotations, no output schema, and many similar sibling tools, a single-word description provides insufficient information for an agent to understand or use this tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters (schema coverage 100%), so no parameter documentation is needed. The description doesn't add parameter semantics, but with no parameters, the baseline is appropriately high as there's nothing to compensate for.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'detailUrl' is a tautology that merely restates the tool name without any verb or action. It provides no information about what the tool does, what resource it operates on, or how it differs from sibling tools like 'detail' or 'detailurl'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. With many sibling tools (e.g., 'detail', 'detailurl', 'detail_1' through 'detail_7'), the description offers no context, prerequisites, or distinctions to inform selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.