delete_header

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must cover behavioral details. It only discloses that the tool deletes a header by location, but omits critical behaviors such as reversibility, error handling for missing headers, or impact on sections/pages.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no extraneous words. Every word serves a purpose, making it highly concise and scannable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple nature of the tool and the presence of an output schema, the description is adequate but leaves open questions about scope (e.g., which section's header) and edge cases. It would benefit from noting if it affects all sections or just the current one.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds the allowed values for the location parameter (default, first, even), which is essential. However, it does not explain the meaning of each value (e.g., 'even' likely refers to even pages), missing an opportunity for full clarity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the action (delete) and resource (header), and clarifies the parameter location with specific allowed values (default, first, even). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like delete_footer or edit_header_footer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by listing valid locations, but does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_footer, edit_header_footer) or mention prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.