Skip to main content
Glama

create_from_markdown

Generate a Word document from Markdown content, supporting full GitHub-Flavored Markdown features including tables, code blocks, and task lists. Accepts either a Markdown file or raw text input.

Instructions

Create a new .docx document from markdown content.

Supports full GitHub-Flavored Markdown: headings, bold/italic/strikethrough, links, images, bullet/numbered/nested lists, code blocks, blockquotes, tables, footnotes, and task lists. Smart typography (curly quotes, em/en dashes, ellipses) is applied automatically.

Provide exactly one of md_path or markdown. The document is automatically opened for editing under the given handle.

Args: output_path: Path for the new .docx file. md_path: Path to a .md file. Mutually exclusive with markdown. markdown: Raw markdown text. Mutually exclusive with md_path. template_path: Optional path to a .dotx template file. document_handle: Optional handle to store this document under.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
md_pathNo
markdownNo
output_pathYes
template_pathNo
document_handleNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries the burden. It mentions automatic opening for editing and smart typography, but does not cover file overwrite behavior or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Well-structured with bullet points and clear phrasing. The list of markdown features is relevant but slightly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers main parameter constraints and optional features. Missing details on overwrite behavior, but output schema exists and return values are not required to be explained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters5/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema coverage, the description compensates fully by explaining each parameter, including mutual exclusivity and optional parameters like template_path and document_handle.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it creates a new .docx from markdown, specifying the resource and action clearly. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_document and export_markdown.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explains mutual exclusivity of md_path and markdown, but lacks explicit guidance on when to choose this over alternatives like create_document.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Arvindh95Censof/grp-docx-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server