wps_wpp_get_current_slide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description bears the full burden. It states the result (sequence number) but doesn't disclose side effects, error conditions, or whether the call is read-only. The description is truthful but minimal; it does not contradict any annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, clear sentence in Chinese that fully describes the tool's function. No wasted words; front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter tool without an output schema, the description adequately covers the core functionality. It does not explain behavior if no presentation is open or if there is no current slide, but the tool is simple enough that this is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the schema is trivially 100% covered. The description adds no parameter information, which is acceptable. Per guidelines, baseline for no parameters is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: getting the sequence number of the current slide. The verb '获取' (get) and resource '当前所在幻灯片的序号' (current slide's sequence number) are specific. It distinguishes well from sibling tools like wps_wpp_read_slide or wps_wpp_add_slide.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when or when not to use this tool versus alternatives is provided. For a simple getter, usage is implied, but the absence of explicit context or prerequisites keeps it at an adequate but not exemplary level.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.