wps_wpp_delete_slide

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. The description only states the basic action; it does not mention whether the deletion is permanent, if there is an undo capability, if it affects other slides (e.g., reindexing), or any required permissions. The description adds minimal value beyond the tool name.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence in Chinese with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and to the point. For a simple tool with one parameter, this is appropriately sized.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema, no nested objects), the description is nearly complete for basic understanding. However, it lacks any mention of what happens after deletion (e.g., slide reindexing) or constraints like not being able to delete the last slide, which would be useful for an AI agent. The description is adequate but has some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (single parameter slide_index with description '幻灯片序号'). The description does not add meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline is 3 when coverage is high and no additional parameter details are given.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states '删除指定幻灯片' (delete specified slide) which is a specific verb+resource combination. It identifies the tool's purpose of deleting a slide, and among siblings like wps_wpp_add_slide, wps_wpp_duplicate_slide, and wps_wpp_move_slide, it distinguishes itself as the deletion operation. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from these siblings in the description text.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like removing all content from a slide instead of deleting it, or using other slide manipulation tools. There are no explicit conditions, prerequisites, or exclusions mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.