Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to draftly-wps

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude to search, read, create, and edit a user's personal WPS cloud documents, spreadsheets, and presentations—including reading and writing cells, replacing text, and discovering and running any of 619 WPS capabilities, with explicit confirmation required for destructive or sensitive operations. It runs remotely with one-time OAuth authorization, so no local install is needed.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents on Windows to drive real Microsoft Word and WPS Office applications through COM, automating legacy .doc/.docx batch conversion, bookmark and placeholder template filling, print-fidelity PDF export, extraction from legacy binaries, editing of documents currently open on screen, and mail-merge batch generation. It hardens these operations with CJK font preservation, password and corruption pre-checks, structured self-correcting errors, path allowlisting, read-only mode, and automatic Word-to-WPS failover.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to directly read and modify the WPS Writer, Spreadsheets, and Presentation documents a user already has open on Windows, by driving real COM automation instead of simulated clicks. It exposes 306 tools across Word, Excel, PPT, and general-purpose groups (40 listed by default with on-demand group loading), covering formulas, charts, formatting, slides, and document management, with retry-safety markers and machine-readable read/write annotations.
      224 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 86 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    工具通过 wps_word/wps_et/wps_wpp 前缀区分三大宿主,且动作+对象命名清晰,绝大多数工具边界明确。但存在少数易混点:wps_et_read_range 不传 cell 与 wps_et_get_selection 都会读取当前选区,另有一组 status/probe 诊断工具职责相近,可能造成误选。

    Naming Consistency4/5

    整体保持 wps_<host>_<verb>_<noun> 的 snake_case 模式,如 wps_word_get_revisions、wps_wpp_add_slide,规律性强。少数例外如 wps_status、wps_reload_addin 缺少宿主前缀,wps_word_new 用 new 而非 create,略有偏差。

    Tool Count1/5

    86 个工具远超典型 MCP 工具集规模,即使按 Word/ET/PPT 三个宿主拆分,每个子集仍超过 25 个,整体命名空间对 agent 造成很大选择与记忆负担;其中还包含多个 probe 诊断类工具,进一步膨胀数量。

    Completeness3/5

    Word 的覆盖很完整(新建、读写、表格、批注、修订、分节页码、目录等),ET 与 PPT 也覆盖大量核心操作。但存在明显缺口:没有 wps_et_new/wps_wpp_new 来新建表格和演示文稿,ET 缺少导出 PDF,PPT 明确不提供形状动画,且工作簿的工作表管理(增删/重命名)也缺失。

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues