ninja_get_ticket
Retrieve a ticket and its complete details by specifying the ticket ID.
Instructions
Get a ticket and all its details by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticketId | Yes | Ticket ID |
Retrieve a ticket and its complete details by specifying the ticket ID.
Get a ticket and all its details by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ticketId | Yes | Ticket ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description lacks behavioral details like authentication requirements, caching hints, or rate limits. Claims 'all its details' but does not specify what that entails.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no filler. Could be more structured but adequate for a simple read operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema provided; description fails to indicate what ticket details are returned. For a general get tool, this is a significant gap.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'ticketId'. Description adds no meaning beyond 'by ID', so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clear verb 'Get' with resource 'ticket' and criterion 'by ID'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like create, update, and sub-component getters (e.g., ninja_get_ticket_attributes).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as ninja_get_ticket_attributes or ninja_get_tickets_by_board. Does not mention scope or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Allied-Business-Solutions/ninjaone-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server