NinjaOne MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to NinjaOne MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for the NinjaOne RMM platform, enabling tools to manage devices, organizations, alerts, jobs, and policies through NinjaOne's API.26Apache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects AI assistants to the NinjaOne remote monitoring and management platform via the REST API v2. It provides tools for device inventory, organization management, alert handling, maintenance scheduling, and automated job execution.221-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for NinjaOne RMM that exposes tools for managing organizations, devices, alerts, ticketing, and automation/scripting via NinjaOne's Public API v2.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for MSP360 platform enabling management of backup and RMM operations through Claude Desktop with 69 tools.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for Action1, a cloud-native RMM platform, enabling remote monitoring, patch management, and endpoint management through Action1's API.62Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI assistants to interact with your LogicMonitor, providing 125 tools for comprehensive monitoring and management operations.7049 npm12AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 96 tools
The tool set is very large (96 tools) with many overlapping verb-noun pairs like 'getting' versus 'querying' device details. Agents may struggle to distinguish between similar tools such as 'ninja_get_device_os_patches' and 'ninja_query_os_patches', leading to potential misselection.
All tools consistently follow the pattern 'ninja_verb_noun' (e.g., ninja_create_organization, ninja_list_devices). However, there is slight variation in verb choice (e.g., 'submit' vs 'apply' for patching actions), which is minor.
With 96 tools, the server is over-saturated. While the RMM domain is broad, this many tools overwhelm agents and increase cognitive load. A more curated set (20-40) would improve usability.
The tool set covers most major aspects of device management, ticketing, patching, and querying. Notable gaps include no delete operations for tickets or organizations, but the surface is otherwise comprehensive for typical RMM tasks.