Get Upgrade Status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true. The description adds value by specifying the exact information returned (versions, channel, firmware availability), enhancing transparency beyond the annotations. No contradictions. A slight deduction because the description doesn't mention any side effects (though none exist).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with the key action and resource. No unnecessary words. Highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool is simple with one optional parameter and no output schema. Description fully explains the return values and covers all necessary context. No gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (both properties described). The description does not add any additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Read' and identifies the resource as 'RouterOS package upgrade status and routerboard firmware versions'. It lists concrete output fields (installed version, latest available, update channel, firmware upgrade availability), making its purpose crystal clear and distinguishing it from siblings like 'manage_upgrade' which perform modifications.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit 'when to use' or alternative guidance, but the name and description strongly imply it is for pre-upgrade checks. The sibling tool 'manage_upgrade' exists, suggesting this is for read-only status. A score of 4 reflects clear implicit usage without explicit exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.