A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA bridge between AI assistants and MikroTik RouterOS devices, allowing natural language interaction to manage network configurations including VLANs, firewalls, DNS settings, and more.
1
MIT
MikroMCP
by AliKarami
Related Servers
Alternatives to MikroMCP
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with MikroTik RouterOS devices through API and SSH connections, supporting network monitoring, configuration management, and diagnostics across multiple routers with automatic connection fallback.3MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for managing MikroTik RouterOS devices, enabling reading device state and performing guarded write operations such as setting identity via natural language.1142GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for managing MikroTik RouterOS fleets, exposing 65+ tools for system administration, interfaces, firewall, DHCP/DNS, PPP, diagnostics, and SSH command execution with KeePass-backed credentials.10 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceHigh-performance TypeScript MCP server for MikroTik RouterOS management, enabling Claude, GPT-4, or any MCP-compatible AI to manage routers through natural language with dynamic API discovery, VPN management, and configuration backup.14 npm4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for network device management via SSH/Telnet. Supports multiple vendors such as Cisco IOS and BDCOM, enabling AI assistants to execute commands and manage routers, switches, and firewalls.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for VyOS routers via VyManager, enabling AI agents to read and manage router configurations with RBAC, audit, and commit-confirm safety.11GPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for MikroTik RouterOS with multi-router support, environment-based auto-load, split read/write architecture, and selectable runtime modes: readonly, safe-write, full.1-
TDQS
B3.4/5.0
Scored across 133 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Most tools are distinguishable by resource and action, but the sheer number of list_/get_/manage_ pairs creates several easily confused boundaries, such as get_system_status vs get_system_clock, get_ntp_settings vs manage_ntp_client, and write_swos_blob vs apply_swos_config. The bulk_execute vs bulk_read distinction is explicitly clarified, but many high-level and low-level SwOS and container tools still require careful reading to choose correctly.
Naming Consistency4/5
The dominant pattern is consistent snake_case verb_noun, with list_*, get_*, manage_*, bulk_*, and apply_* families used predictably across most resources. There are some deviations such as reboot, ping, traceroute, torch, bandwidth_test, and fetch_url, but they are domain-specific and still readable.
Tool Count1/5
133 tools is an extreme count for a single MCP server, far beyond the 50+ threshold associated with severe mismatch. Even for a broad MikroTik management domain, this creates substantial selection and cognitive-load problems for an agent.
Completeness3/5
The surface is broad and covers many RouterOS and SwOS workflows with list/manage pairs, but notable gaps remain: BGP and OSPF are list-only, IPv6 is essentially absent, certificate management cannot import/create, and several advanced RouterOS areas such as hotspot and RADIUS are not represented. Agents can fall back to run_command for some missing operations, but that is less safe and not equivalent to proper tool coverage.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive