A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA bridge between AI assistants and MikroTik RouterOS devices, allowing natural language interaction to manage network configurations including VLANs, firewalls, DNS settings, and more.
1
MIT
MikroMCP
by AliKarami
Related Servers
Alternatives to MikroMCP
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with MikroTik RouterOS devices through API and SSH connections, supporting network monitoring, configuration management, and diagnostics across multiple routers with automatic connection fallback.3MIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for managing MikroTik RouterOS devices, enabling reading device state and performing guarded write operations such as setting identity via natural language.114GPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for managing MikroTik RouterOS fleets, exposing 65+ tools for system administration, interfaces, firewall, DHCP/DNS, PPP, diagnostics, and SSH command execution with KeePass-backed credentials.10 npm2Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceHigh-performance TypeScript MCP server for MikroTik RouterOS management, enabling Claude, GPT-4, or any MCP-compatible AI to manage routers through natural language with dynamic API discovery, VPN management, and configuration backup.6 npm4MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server for network device management via SSH/Telnet. Supports multiple vendors such as Cisco IOS and BDCOM, enabling AI assistants to execute commands and manage routers, switches, and firewalls.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for VyOS routers via VyManager, enabling AI agents to read and manage router configurations with RBAC, audit, and commit-confirm safety.9GPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for MikroTik RouterOS with multi-router support, environment-based auto-load, split read/write architecture, and selectable runtime modes: readonly, safe-write, full.-
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 122 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The list_/manage_/get_ pairs are mostly distinct, with clear object-specific names (e.g., manage_dhcp_lease vs manage_dhcp_server). A few clusters (container config/env/mount, routing rules/tables) could cause initial confusion, but descriptions disambiguate well. Overall, tool boundaries are clear despite the large surface.
Naming Consistency4/5
Nearly all tools use snake_case with a verb_object pattern (list_, manage_, get_, run_, etc.). Minor deviations like traceroute, ping, torch, and bandwidth_test are standalone commands, but the convention is consistent enough to be predictable.
Tool Count1/5
122 tools is far beyond the 3-15 range for a well-scoped server and exceeds the 50-tool threshold for extreme mismatch. While the domain is broad, the count harms usability and suggests many tools could be consolidated or grouped.
Completeness4/5
The server covers an impressive breadth of RouterOS and SwOS functionality, with paired list/manage tools for most objects. Gaps exist (e.g., SNMP settings are read-only, OSPF/BGP only listed, certificates lack creation/import), but the run_command escape hatch allows workarounds. Overall, coverage is strong but not fully exhaustive.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week