List DHCP Leases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description is fully consistent with annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint). It adds context about filtering and pagination behavior, which complements the annotations without contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that front-loads the core function and lists key capabilities. Every word adds value; no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and the rich schema, the description is complete. It mentions pagination (important for listing tools) and all filter options. No output schema is needed as the return format is implicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with good descriptions for all 7 parameters. The description briefly mentions the filter options but adds no significant semantic value beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists DHCP leases on a MikroTik router, with optional filtering by server, status, type, and MAC address, and supports pagination. It is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'list_dhcp_clients' and 'manage_dhcp_lease'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use it (to view leases with optional filters) but does not explicitly mention when not to use it or suggest alternatives like 'manage_dhcp_lease' for modifications. The context is clear enough for a read-only list tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.