Semantic Search MCP Server

/Users/mix0z/Library/Python/3.9/lib/python/site-packages/urllib3/__init__.py:35: NotOpenSSLWarning: urllib3 v2 only supports OpenSSL 1.1.1+, currently the 'ssl' module is compiled with 'LibreSSL 2.8.3'. See: https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/issues/3020 warnings.warn( /Users/mix0z/Library/Python/3.9/lib/python/site-packages/google/api_core/_python_version_support.py:252: FutureWarning: You are using a Python version (3.9.6) past its end of life. Google will update google.api_core with critical bug fixes on a best-effort basis, but not with any other fixes or features. Please upgrade to the latest Python version, or at least Python 3.10, and then update google.api_core. warnings.warn(message, FutureWarning) An error occurred: module 'importlib.metadata' has no attribute 'packages_distributions' Output directory: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918 Loaded 12 questions ================================================================================ Question: django_request_response_lifecycle Repo: django Query: My custom middleware adds a header but sometimes it's missing in the final response. I suspect somet... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 48, 'Python': 2884} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['django', 'docs', 'extras', 'js_tests', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['pyproject.toml', 'package.json', 'tests/admin_scripts/custom_templates/project_template/additional_dir/requirements.txt', 'docs/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 2230ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: Django [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['django/apps/', 'django/conf/', 'django/contrib/', 'django/core/', 'django/db/', 'django/dispatch/', 'django/forms/', 'django/http/', 'django/middleware/', 'django/tasks/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1825ms [SGR] Concepts: ['request lifecycle', 'response modification', 'header manipulation', 'middleware execution order'] [SGR] User problem: The user is experiencing intermittent issues where a custom header added by their middleware is missing in the final response, suggesting it might be removed by subsequent processing. [SGR] What to find: The complete sequence of operations that modify the response object, from the beginning of the request lifecycle to the end, to identify what might be removing the custom header. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1115ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['django/dispatch/', 'django/db/', 'docs/', 'django/tasks/', 'tests/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['django/middleware', 'django/http'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/apps/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/conf/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/contrib/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/core/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 1546ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['middleware', 'request', 'response', 'http', 'header'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['handler', 'lifecycle'] [SGR] Likely files: ['django/middleware/', 'django/http/', 'django/core/handlers/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 3 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/__init__.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/cache.py [SGR] [Read] django/middleware/cache.py: 9 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/clickjacking.py [SGR] [Read] django/middleware/clickjacking.py: 3 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/http/__init__.py [SGR] [Read] django/http/__init__.py: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/http/cookie.py [SGR] [Read] django/http/cookie.py: 1 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/http/multipartparser.py [SGR] [Read] django/http/multipartparser.py: 6 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/handlers/__init__.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/handlers/asgi.py [SGR] [Read] django/core/handlers/asgi.py: 12 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/handlers/base.py [SGR] [Read] django/core/handlers/base.py: 5 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 36 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 3729ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: middleware [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: request [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: response [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: middleware - Search for how 'middleware' is defined or used in [SGR] 2. grep: request - Search for how 'http' headers are handled, looking [SGR] 3. list_dir: N/A - Explore the directory structure to understand wher [SGR] 4. grep: response - Search for terms related to the 'lifecycle' of a r [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 middleware /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 request /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 response /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 1170 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 4091 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 5870 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 873ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['django/core/handlers/base.py:26: def load_middleware(self, is_async=False)', 'django/core/handlers/base.py:40: for middleware_path in reversed(settings.MIDDLEWARE)', 'django/core/handlers/wsgi.py:118: self.load_middleware()', 'django/test/client.py:173: self.load_middleware()', 'django/test/client.py:224: self.load_middleware(is_async=True)'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 604ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 755ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1015ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['django/template/response.py', 'django/views/generic/base.py'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 855ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 4975ms [SGR] Summary: The Django request/response cycle involves middleware being processed in a specific order. Your cust... [SGR] Code locations: 3 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/handlers/base.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/handlers/base.py [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/handlers/wsgi.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/handlers/wsgi.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/handlers/asgi.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/handlers/asgi.py [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 3 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 20406ms [SGR] LLM time: 19840ms [SGR] Tool time: 566ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 3, 'list_dir': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → low → low → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/django_request_response_lifecycle_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/django_request_response_lifecycle_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['django/core/handlers/base.py', 'django/core/handlers/wsgi.py', 'django/core/handlers/exception.py', 'django/utils/deprecation.py'] Found: ['django/core/handlers/base.py', 'django/core/handlers/wsgi.py', 'django/core/handlers/asgi.py'] Matched: ['django/core/handlers/base.py', 'django/core/handlers/wsgi.py'] Recall: 50% ================================================================================ Question: django_queryset_lazy_evaluation Repo: django Query: I have a view that builds up a complex query with many chained methods, but the page loads instantly... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 48, 'Python': 2884} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['django', 'docs', 'extras', 'js_tests', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['pyproject.toml', 'package.json', 'tests/admin_scripts/custom_templates/project_template/additional_dir/requirements.txt', 'docs/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1192ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: Django [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['django/core/', 'django/db/', 'django/http/', 'django/views/', 'django/conf/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 984ms [SGR] Concepts: ['lazy evaluation', 'query building', 'query execution', 'result iteration'] [SGR] User problem: The user is experiencing a performance issue where a complex query executes instantly when built but takes 5 seconds to complete when the results are iterated over. [SGR] What to find: The code that implements the delayed execution of the query. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1391ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['examples/', 'mocks/', '.idea/', '.vscode/', '.mypy_cache/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['django/db/backends', 'django/db/models'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/core/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/db/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/http/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/views/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2981ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['QuerySet', 'db.models.query', 'db.models.expressions', 'iter'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['lazy', 'execute'] [SGR] Likely files: ['django/db/models/query.py', 'django/db/models/expressions.py'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 2 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/db/models/query.py [SGR] [Read] django/db/models/query.py: 7 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/db/models/expressions.py [SGR] [Read] django/db/models/expressions.py: 33 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 37 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 21137ms [SGR] Gemini call took 3017ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: QuerySet [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: db.models.query [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: db.models.expressions [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: iter [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: lazy [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: QuerySet - Search for the 'QuerySet' class definition to unde [SGR] 2. grep: db.models.query - Search for 'db.models.query' to find relevant code [SGR] 3. grep: db.models.expressions - Search for 'db.models.expressions' to find code re [SGR] 4. grep: iter - Search for the 'iter' method to understand how res [SGR] 5. grep: lazy - Search for 'lazy' to investigate potential lazy ev [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 QuerySet /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 db.models.query /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 db.models.expressions /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 44 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 iter /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 247 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 lazy /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 1778 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 738 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 1563 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1223ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['django/shortcuts.py:59: Return a QuerySet or a Manager.', 'django/core/paginator.py:74: Warn if self.object_list is unordered (typically a QuerySet).', 'django/core/serializers/python.py:16: Serialize a QuerySet to basic Python objects.', 'django/core/serializers/xml_serializer.py:39: """Serialize a QuerySet to XML."""', 'django/views/generic/list.py:3: from django.db.models import QuerySet'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 855ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['django/db/models/sql/query.py', 'django/db/models/query.py', 'django/db/models/query_utils.py', 'django/db/models/manager.py'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2722ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['django/db/models/sql/where.py', 'django/db/models/sql/query.py', 'django/db/models/sql/compiler.py', 'django/db/models/base.py', 'django/db/models/constraints.py', 'django/db/models/fields/related_lookups.py', 'django/db/models/fields/composite.py', 'django/db/models/fields/__init__.py', 'django/db/models/fields/tuple_lookups.py', 'django/db/models/fields/generated.py'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3050ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['django/http/response.py:403: # Consume iterators upon assignment to allow repeated iteration.', 'django/http/response.py:404: if hasattr(value, "__iter__") and not isinstance(value, (str, bytes))', 'django/http/response.py:423: def __iter__(self):', 'django/http/response.py:424: return iter(self._container)', 'django/http/response.py:445: A streaming HTTP response class with an iterator as content.', 'django/http/response.py:447: This should only be iterated once, when the response is streamed to the client.', 'django/http/response.py:500: # Ensure we can never iterate on "value" more than once.', 'django/http/response.py:502: self._iterator = iter(value)', 'django/http/response.py:505: self._iterator = aiter(value)', 'django/http/response.py:510: def __iter__(self):'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1118ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['django/apps/registry.py:54: # `lazy_model_operation()` and `do_pending_operations()` methods.', 'django/apps/registry.py:388: def lazy_model_operation(self, function, *model_keys):', 'django/conf/__init__.py:41: A lazy proxy for either global Django settings or a custom settings object.', 'django/utils/translation.py: (multiple instances of gettext_lazy, pgettext_lazy)', 'django/utils/regex_helper.py: (_lazy_re_compile)'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 758ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 5748ms [SGR] Summary: The delayed execution you are observing is a feature of Django's ORM, where QuerySets are evaluated ... [SGR] Code locations: 2 [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/db/models/query.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/db/models/query.py [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/http/response.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/http/response.py [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 2 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 51045ms [SGR] LLM time: 47527ms [SGR] Tool time: 3517ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → medium → medium → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/django_queryset_lazy_evaluation_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/django_queryset_lazy_evaluation_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['django/db/models/query.py', 'django/db/models/query.py'] Found: ['django/db/models/query.py', 'django/http/response.py'] Matched: ['django/db/models/query.py', 'django/db/models/query.py'] Recall: 100% ================================================================================ Question: gin_route_tree_matching Repo: gin Query: I registered /users/new before /users/:id but requests to /users/new are hitting the :id handler. Wh... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Go': 96} [SGR] Primary (detected): Go [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['binding', 'codec', 'docs', 'examples', 'ginS', 'internal', 'render', 'testdata'] [SGR] Manifests: ['go.mod', 'go.sum'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1402ms [SGR] Final Language: go [SGR] Final Framework: Gin [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['binding/', 'codec/', 'docs/', 'examples/', 'ginS/', 'internal/', 'render/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1538ms [SGR] Concepts: ['route matching', 'request routing', 'pattern specificity'] [SGR] User problem: Requests to /users/new are being handled by the /users/:id handler, even though /users/new was registered first. The user wants to understand why the order of registration matters and how the framework prioritizes matching routes. [SGR] What to find: the code that determines how the framework matches incoming requests to registered route patterns, specifically how it handles overlapping patterns and prioritizes them. [SGR] Question type: why_behavior [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1945ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['docs/', 'examples/', 'ginS/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['gin.go', 'tree.go'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: binding/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: codec/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: docs/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: examples/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2624ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['router', 'Path', 'tree'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['gin.go', 'context.go'] [SGR] Likely files: ['gin.go', 'path.go'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 2 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR] [Read] gin.go: 3 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: path.go [SGR] [Read] path.go: 3 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 6 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 4422ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: router [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: Path [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: tree [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: gin.go [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: router - Search for the primary terms 'router', 'Path', and [SGR] 2. grep: Path - Investigate the definition and usage of 'Path' to [SGR] 3. grep: tree - Explore the use of 'tree' in the context of routin [SGR] 4. grep: gin.go - Directly search for concepts related to the user's [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 router /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 Path /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 tree /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 8 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 gin.go /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 63 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 38 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 52 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1065ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['router in gin.go', 'Path in gin.go', 'tree in gin.go'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1302ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['Path in gin.go', 'RedirectFixedPath in gin.go', 'UseRawPath in gin.go', 'UseEscapedPath in gin.go', 'UnescapePathValues in gin.go'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1900ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['routeTreesUpdated in gin.go', 'methodTrees in gin.go', 'updateRouteTree in gin.go', 'node in tree_test.go', 'addRoute in tree_test.go'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1457ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['gin.go', 'debug_test.go', 'tree_test.go'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1426ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 5681ms [SGR] Summary: In Gin, the order in which routes are registered matters when dealing with overlapping patterns. Spe... [SGR] Code locations: 3 [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR] [Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR] [Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] [Tool] read_file: path.go [SGR] [Tool] read_file: path.go [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] [Tool] read_file: tree_test.go [SGR] [Tool] read_file: tree_test.go [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 3 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 24855ms [SGR] LLM time: 24781ms [SGR] Tool time: 74ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 4} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → medium → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/gin_route_tree_matching_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/gin_route_tree_matching_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['tree.go', 'gin.go'] Found: ['gin.go', 'path.go', 'tree_test.go'] Matched: ['gin.go'] Recall: 50% ================================================================================ Question: gin_context_pool_reuse Repo: gin Query: I spawned a goroutine from my handler and passed it the request context, but later the data in the c... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Go': 96} [SGR] Primary (detected): Go [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['binding', 'codec', 'docs', 'examples', 'ginS', 'internal', 'render', 'testdata'] [SGR] Manifests: ['go.mod', 'go.sum'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1612ms [SGR] Final Language: go [SGR] Final Framework: Gin [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['binding/', 'codec/', 'docs/', 'examples/', 'ginS/', 'internal/', 'render/', 'testdata/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1195ms [SGR] Concepts: ['goroutine', 'context', 'concurrency', 'data corruption'] [SGR] User problem: The user is experiencing data corruption in request contexts when passing them to goroutines, and needs to understand how to use contexts safely in background tasks. [SGR] What to find: The code that causes context data corruption when passed to goroutines and how to safely use contexts in background tasks. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 794ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['docs/', 'examples/', 'testdata/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: binding/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: codec/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: docs/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: examples/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 5051ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['context', 'goroutine', 'Context', 'gin.Context', 'go.mod', 'sync', 'pattern', 'errors'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['binding', 'gin', 'render', 'internal'] [SGR] Likely files: ['context.go', 'gin.go'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 2 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: context.go [SGR] [Read] context.go: 9 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR] [Read] gin.go: 3 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 12 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 3153ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: context [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: goroutine [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: Context [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: context - Search for primary terms 'context' and 'goroutine' [SGR] 2. grep: goroutine - Search for specific context types ('Context', 'gin [SGR] 3. grep: Context - Search for 'sync' to find concurrency primitives t [SGR] 4. glob_search: N/A - Locate specific files ('context.go', 'gin.go') lik [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 context /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 goroutine /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 Context /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 4 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 9 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 51 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1271ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ["context.go:127: // Copy returns a copy of the current context that can be safely used outside the request's scope.", 'context.go:128: // This has to be used when the context has to be passed to a goroutine.'] [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1410ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['context.go:128: // This has to be used when the context has to be passed to a goroutine.', 'context_test.go:3183: // start async goroutine for calling srv', 'githubapi_test.go:454: // Each goroutine has its own bytes.Buffer.', 'githubapi_test.go:470: // Each goroutine has its own bytes.Buffer.'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1229ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['gin.go:51: type HandlerFunc func(*Context)', 'gin.go:172: // ContextWithFallback enable fallback Context.Deadline(), Context.Done(), Context.Err() and Context.Value() when Context.Request.Context() is not nil', 'gin.go:667: c := engine.pool.Get().(*Context)', "context.go:127: // Copy returns a copy of the current context that can be safely used outside the request's scope.", 'context.go:128: // This has to be used when the context has to be passed to a goroutine.'] [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR] Need more: False [SGR] High confidence with relevant findings - preparing answer [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 4302ms [SGR] Summary: When passing a Gin context to a goroutine, you should use the `Copy()` method to create a copy of th... [SGR] Code locations: 1 [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR] [Tool] read_file: context.go [SGR] [Tool] read_file: context.go [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 1 [SGR] Total iterations: 3 [SGR] Total time: 24972ms [SGR] LLM time: 24912ms [SGR] Tool time: 60ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 3} [SGR] Confidence progression: high → medium → high [SGR] High confidence reached at iteration: 1 Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/gin_context_pool_reuse_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/gin_context_pool_reuse_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['gin.go', 'context.go'] Found: ['context.go'] Matched: ['context.go'] Recall: 50% ================================================================================ Question: codeql_dataflow_configuration Repo: codeql Query: I wrote a function that validates and escapes user input but CodeQL still reports it as vulnerable. ... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 1955, 'C++': 5, 'C': 5, 'Go': 814, 'Java': 7, 'CodeQL': 2147, 'JavaScript': 12, 'Rust': 118} [SGR] Primary (detected): CodeQL [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Manifests: ['Cargo.toml', 'Cargo.lock', 'misc/legacy-support/python/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/java/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/cpp/qlpack.yml'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 17949ms [SGR] Gemini call took 2527ms [SGR] [Override] Language: python → other [SGR] Final Language: other [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1564ms [SGR] Concepts: ['input validation', 'data sanitization', 'taint analysis', 'CodeQL security analysis'] [SGR] User problem: The user has a validation function that they believe should prevent vulnerabilities, but CodeQL still flags it as vulnerable. They want to know how to properly mark their function so that CodeQL recognizes it as a sanitizing function. [SGR] What to find: How to mark a custom validation function as a sanitizing function so that CodeQL stops tracking tainted data through it. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1631ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['samples/', 'docs/', 'fixture/', 'tests/', 'mock/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: actions [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: change-notes [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: config [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: cpp [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2528ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['validation', 'sanitization', 'taint', 'CodeQL'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['actions', 'ql'] [SGR] Likely files: [] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 1982ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: validation [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: sanitization [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: taint [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: CodeQL [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: validation - Search for CodeQL's handling of taint tracking and [SGR] 2. grep: sanitization - Search for how CodeQL identifies validation functi [SGR] 3. grep: taint - Search for how CodeQL identifies sanitization func [SGR] 4. grep: CodeQL - Search for how CodeQL handles taint analysis in ge [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 validation /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 sanitization /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 taint /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 217 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 CodeQL /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 639 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 12702 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 1936 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 830ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1181ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['change-notes/1.19/analysis-javascript.md: The taint tracking library now recognizes additional sanitization patterns.', 'change-notes/1.20/analysis-java.md: Results involving a sanitization step.', 'change-notes/1.18/analysis-javascript.md: The taint tracking library now recognizes additional sanitization patterns.', "change-notes/1.18/analysis-javascript.md: The 'Incomplete sanitization' query has a new name and more true-positive results."] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1144ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 802ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1555ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 1830ms [SGR] Summary: CodeQL... [SGR] Code locations: 1 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 40311ms [SGR] LLM time: 36832ms [SGR] Tool time: 3480ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 4} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → medium → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/codeql_dataflow_configuration_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/codeql_dataflow_configuration_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/dataflow/Configuration.qll', 'javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/dataflow/TaintTracking.qll', 'docs/codeql/codeql-language-guides/analyzing-data-flow-in-javascript-and-typescript.rst'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: codeql_security_query_structure Repo: codeql Query: I want to find places where data from HTTP request parameters ends up being written to the page with... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 1955, 'C++': 5, 'C': 5, 'Go': 814, 'Java': 7, 'CodeQL': 2147, 'JavaScript': 12, 'Rust': 118} [SGR] Primary (detected): CodeQL [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Manifests: ['Cargo.toml', 'Cargo.lock', 'misc/legacy-support/python/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/java/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/cpp/qlpack.yml'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1543ms [SGR] [Override] Language: python → other [SGR] Final Language: other [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1504ms [SGR] Concepts: ['http request parameters', 'data writing', 'unsafe output', 'encoding', 'data tracing'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to find instances where data from HTTP request parameters is written to the page without proper encoding, indicating a potential security vulnerability. [SGR] What to find: Code that writes unencoded data from HTTP request parameters to the page, tracing the data flow from input to output. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1313ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['docs/', 'cpp/', 'config/', 'change-notes/', 'java/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: actions [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: change-notes [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: config [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: cpp [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2860ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['http', 'request', 'parameter', 'encoding', 'trace', 'write', 'output'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['actions', 'config'] [SGR] Likely files: [] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2286ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: http [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: request [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: parameter [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: encoding [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: trace [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: http - Search for occurrences of 'http' and 'request' to [SGR] 2. grep: request - Search for 'parameter' to identify where request p [SGR] 3. grep: parameter - Search for 'encoding' to find any encoding/decodin [SGR] 4. grep: encoding - Search for 'write' or 'output' in conjunction with [SGR] 5. grep: trace - Search for 'unsafe' or 'direct' output patterns to [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 http /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 request /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 parameter /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 6654 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 encoding /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 22292 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 trace /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 20204 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 2484 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 2677 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 924ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1289ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['python/PoCs/XmlParsing/PoC.py:117: from flask import request', 'python/PoCs/XmlParsing/PoC.py:119: exfiltrated_data = request.args["data"]'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 729ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 980ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 633ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 670ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 3856ms [SGR] Summary: The provided code snippet shows data being read from HTTP request parameters without any apparent en... [SGR] Code locations: 1 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/PoCs/XmlParsing/PoC.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/PoCs/XmlParsing/PoC.py [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 1 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 24576ms [SGR] LLM time: 18876ms [SGR] Tool time: 5699ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → medium → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/codeql_security_query_structure_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/codeql_security_query_structure_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/security/dataflow/DomBasedXssQuery.qll', 'javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/security/dataflow/Xss.qll', 'javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/security/dataflow/ReflectedXssCustomizations.qll'] Found: ['python/PoCs/XmlParsing/PoC.py'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: infinigen_procedural_material_nodes Repo: infinigen Query: I want to create materials that look different each time based on a seed value - like varied wood gr... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 878, 'C++': 46, 'C': 45} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['docs', 'infinigen', 'infinigen_examples', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'pyproject.toml', 'setup.py'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 2071ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen/core/', 'infinigen/datagen/', 'infinigen/infinigen_gpl/', 'infinigen/OcMesher/', 'infinigen/terrain/', 'infinigen/tools/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_indoor/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_nature/', 'infinigen_examples/constraints/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1111ms [SGR] Concepts: ['procedural generation', 'randomization', 'seed value', 'material appearance', 'rendering integration'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to create randomized visual effects for materials, such as wood grain or rust, that change based on a seed value. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for generating randomized material appearances and how it integrates with Blender for rendering. [SGR] Question type: how_it_works [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1514ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['infinigen_examples/configs_nature/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_indoor/', 'infinigen/tools/', 'infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen_examples/constraints/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/assets/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/core/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/datagen/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/infinigen_gpl/ [SGR] Explored 3 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2440ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['material', 'random', 'procedural', 'render', 'seed'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['appearance', 'material_assignments', 'asset', 'datagen'] [SGR] Likely files: ['infinigen/assets/materials/', 'infinigen/core/rendering/render.py', 'infinigen/datagen/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 3 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/assets/materials/__init__.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/assets/materials/__init__.py: 2 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/assets/materials/art.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/assets/materials/art.py: 16 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/assets/materials/dishwasher_shaders.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/assets/materials/dishwasher_shaders.py: 5 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/rendering/render.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/rendering/render.py: 6 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/__init__.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/job_funcs.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/datagen/job_funcs.py: 4 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/manage_jobs.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/datagen/manage_jobs.py: 5 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 38 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2195ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: material [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: random [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: procedural [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: render [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: seed [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: material - Search for the primary term 'material' to understa [SGR] 2. grep: random - Search for the primary term 'random' to find where [SGR] 3. grep: procedural - Search for the primary term 'procedural' to identi [SGR] 4. grep: render - Search for the primary term 'render' to understand [SGR] 5. grep: seed - Search for the primary term 'seed' to see how seed [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 material /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 random /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 procedural /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 4 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 render /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 2067 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 seed /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 2425 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 247 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 1347 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2150ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['infinigen.assets.materials.fabrics.fabric', 'infinigen.assets.materials.fabrics.leather', 'infinigen.assets.materials.metal.grained_and_polished_metal', 'infinigen.assets.materials.metal.hammered_metal', 'infinigen.assets.materials.ceramics.concrete', 'infinigen.assets.materials.wood.tiled_wood', 'infinigen.assets.materials.plastics.plastic_rough', 'infinigen.assets.materials.fabrics.fabric_random'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2120ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['numpy.random', 'infinigen.core.util.random.random_general', 'infinigen.core.util.random.weighted_sample'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2708ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['pyproject.toml', 'README.md', 'docs/GeneratingIndividualAssets.md', 'docs/CHANGELOG.md', 'docs/ImplementingAssets.md', 'docs/ExportingToExternalFileFormats.md', 'infinigen_examples/generate_asset_demo.py'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1594ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['infinigen/datagen/states.py', 'infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py', 'scripts/eevee_render.py', 'scripts/rebuttal.sh'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1393ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py: seed is used in logging and file path generation', 'infinigen/datagen/manage_jobs.py: seed_generator function generates random seeds, init_scene function takes a seed folder as input'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1046ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 6089ms [SGR] Summary: The system uses procedural generation techniques to create varied appearances for materials, such as... [SGR] Code locations: 6 [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen.core.util.random.random_general [SGR] Skipping non-existent file: infinigen.core.util.random.random_general [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen.core.util.random.weighted_sample [SGR] Skipping non-existent file: infinigen.core.util.random.weighted_sample [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen.assets.materials.wood.tiled_wood [SGR] Skipping non-existent file: infinigen.assets.materials.wood.tiled_wood [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen.assets.materials.metal.grained_and_polished_metal [SGR] Skipping non-existent file: infinigen.assets.materials.metal.grained_and_polished_metal [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/manage_jobs.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/manage_jobs.py [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] [Tool] read_file: scripts/eevee_render.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: scripts/eevee_render.py [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 2 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 26767ms [SGR] LLM time: 26501ms [SGR] Tool time: 266ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → medium → medium → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/infinigen_procedural_material_nodes_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/infinigen_procedural_material_nodes_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['infinigen/core/nodes/node_wrangler.py', 'infinigen/core/nodes/node_utils.py', 'infinigen/core/surface.py'] Found: ['infinigen/datagen/manage_jobs.py', 'scripts/eevee_render.py'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline Repo: infinigen Query: When generating a nature scene, objects need to be distributed realistically - grass under trees, ro... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 878, 'C++': 46, 'C': 45} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['docs', 'infinigen', 'infinigen_examples', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'pyproject.toml', 'setup.py'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 2511ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen/core/', 'infinigen/datagen/', 'infinigen/terrain/', 'infinigen/tools/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_indoor/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_nature/', 'infinigen_examples/constraints/', 'infinigen_examples/util/', 'scripts/install/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1377ms [SGR] Concepts: ['spatial constraints', 'object distribution', 'realistic scene generation', 'object density'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to understand how the system ensures that objects in a generated nature scene are placed realistically, respecting spatial constraints and density. [SGR] What to find: the code that implements the pipeline logic for distributing objects realistically, considering factors like terrain and density. [SGR] Question type: how_it_works [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1449ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['infinigen_examples/', 'scripts/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['infinigen/datagen', 'infinigen/assets', 'infinigen/terrain'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/assets/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/core/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/datagen/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/terrain/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3970ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['placement', 'density', 'instance_scatter', 'constraints', 'terrain'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['realistic_scene_generation', 'pipeline'] [SGR] Likely files: ['infinigen/core/placement/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 1 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/__init__.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/placement/__init__.py: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/animation_policy.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/placement/animation_policy.py: 14 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/camera.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/placement/camera.py: 11 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 25 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2329ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: placement [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: density [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 2 [SGR] 1. grep: placement - Search for the primary terms related to object pla [SGR] 2. grep: density - Search for secondary terms like 'realistic_scene_g [SGR] Executing 2 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 placement /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 density /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 73 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 83 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1700ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/placement.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/density.py', 'infinigen/core/rendering/render.py (displacement related functions)', 'infinigen/core/execute_tasks.py', 'infinigen/core/nodes/shader_utils.py'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1294ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['infinigen/assets/fluid/unit_tests.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1053ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 3111ms [SGR] Summary: The pipeline handles spatial constraints and object density through various placement modules, inclu... [SGR] Code locations: 3 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/placement.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/placement.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/density.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/density.py [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 3 [SGR] Total iterations: 2 [SGR] Total time: 18951ms [SGR] LLM time: 18875ms [SGR] Tool time: 76ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 2} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['infinigen/core/placement/factory.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/placement.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/density.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py'] Found: ['infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/placement.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/density.py'] Matched: ['infinigen/core/placement/placement.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/density.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py'] Recall: 75% ================================================================================ Question: qgis_map_rendering_pipeline Repo: QGIS Query: When I have 10 heavy layers and pan the map, the UI stays responsive and layers appear progressively... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 3312} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['cmake', 'cmake_templates', 'debian', 'doc', 'editors', 'external', 'i18n', 'images', 'linux', 'ms-windows'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'setup.cfg', '.docker/qgis_resources/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 2082ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['cmake', 'debian', 'doc', 'editors', 'external', 'i18n', 'images', 'linux', 'ms-windows', 'nix'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1145ms [SGR] Concepts: ['progressive rendering', 'drawing splitting', 'background drawing', 'UI responsiveness'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to understand how the application maintains UI responsiveness and progressively renders map layers, even with a large number of layers, to avoid freezing. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for splitting up the drawing work and coordinating the background drawing of map layers. [SGR] Question type: how_it_works [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1340ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['docs/', 'doc/', 'tests/', 'bench/', 'fixtures/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: cmake [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: debian [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: doc [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: editors [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2922ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['rendering', 'render', 'draw', 'layer', 'background'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['Renderer', 'progress'] [SGR] Likely files: [] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2352ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: rendering [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: render [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: draw [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: layer [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: background [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: rendering - Search for the primary term 'rendering' to underst [SGR] 2. grep: render - Search for the primary term 'layer' to understand [SGR] 3. grep: draw - Search for the primary term 'background' to unders [SGR] 4. grep: layer - Search for the pattern 'class.*Renderer' to find c [SGR] 5. grep: background - Search for the pattern 'def.*render' to find metho [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 rendering /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 render /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 draw /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 511 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 layer /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 1570 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 background /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 5568 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 1258 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 18820 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 568ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 734ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1076ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['README.md:57: - Advanced styling using data-defined overrides, blending modes, and draw effects', 'python/PyQt6/gui/gui_auto.sip:347: %Include auto_generated/effects/qgseffectdrawmodecombobox.sip', 'src/gui/callouts/qgscalloutwidget.h:162: void drawToAllPartsToggled( bool active );', 'src/gui/callouts/qgscalloutwidget.h:212: void drawToAllPartsToggled( bool active );', 'src/gui/callouts/qgscalloutwidget.cpp:162: connect( mDrawToAllPartsCheck, &QCheckBox::toggled, this, &QgsSimpleLineCalloutWidget::drawToAllPartsToggled );'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 874ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 858ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1139ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 2763ms [SGR] Summary: The provided search results do not contain information about how the application splits up the drawi... [SGR] Code locations: 0 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 22753ms [SGR] LLM time: 18069ms [SGR] Tool time: 4685ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/qgis_map_rendering_pipeline_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/qgis_map_rendering_pipeline_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/core/maprenderer/qgsmaprendererparalleljob.cpp', 'src/core/maprenderer/qgsmaprendererjob.cpp', 'src/gui/qgsmapcanvas.cpp'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: qgis_expression_evaluation Repo: QGIS Query: I have a complex formula in my label settings that calculates text from multiple fields and geometry... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 3312} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['cmake', 'cmake_templates', 'debian', 'doc', 'editors', 'external', 'i18n', 'images', 'linux', 'ms-windows'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'setup.cfg', '.docker/qgis_resources/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1515ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['cmake', 'cmake_templates', 'debian', 'doc', 'editors', 'external', 'i18n', 'images', 'linux', 'ms-windows'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1141ms [SGR] Concepts: ['formula calculation', 'performance optimization', 'label settings'] [SGR] User problem: The user is experiencing slow rendering performance on large datasets due to a complex formula used in label settings. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for calculating the formula in label settings and potential optimizations for this calculation. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 997ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['cmake/', 'doc/', 'linux/', 'debian/', 'editors/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: cmake [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: cmake_templates [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: debian [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: doc [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3010ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['formula', 'label', 'calculation'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['optimization', 'settings'] [SGR] Likely files: [] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 3806ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: formula [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: label [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: calculation [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: optimization [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: settings [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: formula - Search for the primary term 'formula' to find wher [SGR] 2. grep: label - Search for the primary term 'calculation' to find [SGR] 3. grep: calculation - Search for the term 'label' to find where labels a [SGR] 4. grep: optimization - Search for the term 'settings' to find where label [SGR] 5. grep: settings - Search for the term 'optimization' to find any exi [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 formula /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 label /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 calculation /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 845 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 optimization /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 1979 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 settings /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 91 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 2609 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 2542 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1797ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['qgsrastercalculator.h: ParserError = 4, //!< Error parsing formula', 'qgsrastercalculator.h: * \\param formulaString formula for raster calculation', 'qgsrastercalculator.cpp: QgsRasterCalculator::QgsRasterCalculator( const QString &formulaString, const QS'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1202ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1049ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 984ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1159ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1433ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 3583ms [SGR] Summary: The formula calculation for label settings appears to be handled by the `QgsRasterCalculator` class,... [SGR] Code locations: 2 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] [Tool] read_file: qgsrastercalculator.cpp [SGR] Skipping non-existent file: qgsrastercalculator.cpp [SGR] [Tool] read_file: qgsrastercalculator.h [SGR] Skipping non-existent file: qgsrastercalculator.h [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 24658ms [SGR] LLM time: 21897ms [SGR] Tool time: 2761ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/qgis_expression_evaluation_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/qgis_expression_evaluation_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/core/expression/qgsexpression.cpp', 'src/core/qgsexpressioncontext.h', 'src/core/labeling/qgspallabeling.cpp'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: claude_flow_agent_coordination Repo: claude-flow Query: I started multiple workers to process different parts of a project but two of them tried to modify t... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 1154, 'Python': 210, 'TypeScript': 464} [SGR] Primary (detected): JavaScript [SGR] Framework (detected): Express [SGR] Top dirs: ['analysis-reports', 'assets', 'benchmark', 'bin', 'claude-flow-wiki', 'dist-cjs', 'docker', 'docker-test', 'docs', 'examples'] [SGR] Manifests: ['package-lock.json', 'package.json', 'benchmark/requirements.txt', 'benchmark/setup.py', 'benchmark/hive-mind-benchmarks/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1046ms [SGR] Final Language: javascript [SGR] Final Framework: Express [SGR] Final Type: library [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['benchmark/', 'bin/', 'docker/', 'docs/', 'examples/', 'hooks/', 'models/', 'scripts/', 'src/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1059ms [SGR] Concepts: ['concurrency control', 'file locking', 'inter-process communication', 'race conditions'] [SGR] User problem: Two workers are trying to modify the same file simultaneously, causing conflicts and data corruption. [SGR] What to find: The code that handles synchronization between workers to prevent simultaneous file modification. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1979ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['fixture/', 'docs/', 'tests/', 'mock/', 'fixtures/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: benchmark/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: bin/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: docker/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: docs/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2460ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['concurrent', 'coordination', 'worker', 'lock', 'ipc'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['semaphore', 'mutex', 'sync'] [SGR] Likely files: ['bin/', 'benchmark/', 'docs/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 3 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: bin/agent.js [SGR] [Read] bin/agent.js: 5 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: bin/analysis.js [SGR] [Read] bin/analysis.js: 2 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: bin/automation-executor.js [SGR] [Read] bin/automation-executor.js: 1 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: benchmark/CLI_USAGE.md [SGR] [Read] benchmark/CLI_USAGE.md: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: benchmark/KNOWN_ISSUES.md [SGR] [Read] benchmark/KNOWN_ISSUES.md: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: benchmark/NON_INTERACTIVE_COMMANDS.md [SGR] [Read] benchmark/NON_INTERACTIVE_COMMANDS.md: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: docs/.github-release-issue-v2.7.33.md [SGR] [Read] docs/.github-release-issue-v2.7.33.md: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: docs/AGENTDB_BRANCH_MERGE_VERIFICATION.md [SGR] [Read] docs/AGENTDB_BRANCH_MERGE_VERIFICATION.md: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: docs/AGENTIC_FLOW_ENABLED_LOG_FIX.md [SGR] [Read] docs/AGENTIC_FLOW_ENABLED_LOG_FIX.md: 0 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 8 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 1737ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: concurrent [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: coordination [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: worker [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: concurrent - Search for files related to concurrency and coordi [SGR] 2. grep: coordination - Search for files related to inter-process communic [SGR] 3. glob_search: N/A - Find potential files related to workers. [SGR] 4. grep: worker - Search for file locking mechanisms. [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 concurrent /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 coordination /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR] [Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 worker /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 106 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 346 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 1101 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3643ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/utils/npx-isolated-cache.js:7: * concurrent cache conflicts when multiple claude-flow instances', 'src/core/persistence.ts:65: max_concurrent_tasks INTEGER NOT NULL', 'src/core/persistence.ts:106: (id, type, name, status, capabilities, system_prompt, max_concurrent_tasks, priority, created_at)', 'src/core/persistence.ts:135: maxConcurrentTasks: row.max_concurrent_tasks', 'src/core/persistence.ts:154: maxConcurrentTasks: row.max_concurrent_tasks', 'src/swarm/mcp-integration-wrapper.ts:309: // Limit concurrent executions', "src/core/orchestrator.ts:476: throw new SystemError('Maximum concurrent agents reached')", "src/core/orchestrator.ts:526: throw new SystemError('Would exceed maximum concurrent agents')", 'src/verification/interfaces.ts:403: max_concurrent_tasks: number', 'src/providers/google-provider.ts:107: concurrentRequests: 10'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2864ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/agents/agent-registry.ts (lines 3, 379, 382, 391, 392, 399, 402)', 'src/migration/migration-manifest.json (line 62)', 'src/migration/migration-analyzer.ts (line 146)', 'scripts/test-coordination-features.ts (lines 4, 14)', 'src/migration/rollback-manager.ts (line 49)', 'benchmark/src/swarm_benchmark/automation/workflow_executor.py (lines 255, 292, 332, 362)', 'scripts/test-comprehensive.js (lines 36, 61)', 'scripts/fix-ts-advanced.js (line 137)', 'src/maestro/maestro-swarm-coordinator.ts (line 4)', 'src/communication/message-bus.ts (lines 2, 1009)'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 688ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1201ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1220ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 7235ms [SGR] Summary: To prevent multiple workers from modifying the same file simultaneously and causing conflicts, you n... [SGR] Code locations: 7 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/utils/npx-isolated-cache.js [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/utils/npx-isolated-cache.js [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/core/persistence.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/core/persistence.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/swarm/mcp-integration-wrapper.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/swarm/mcp-integration-wrapper.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/core/orchestrator.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/core/orchestrator.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/agents/agent-registry.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/agents/agent-registry.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/communication/message-bus.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/communication/message-bus.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: scripts/test-coordination-features.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: scripts/test-coordination-features.ts [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 7 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 25711ms [SGR] LLM time: 25360ms [SGR] Tool time: 350ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 3, 'glob_search': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/claude_flow_agent_coordination_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/claude_flow_agent_coordination_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/task/coordination.ts', 'src/cli/simple-commands/inject-memory-protocol.js', 'src/resources/resource-manager.ts'] Found: ['src/utils/npx-isolated-cache.js', 'src/core/persistence.ts', 'src/swarm/mcp-integration-wrapper.ts', 'src/core/orchestrator.ts', 'src/agents/agent-registry.ts'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: claude_flow_memory_system Repo: claude-flow Query: My AI assistant learned my coding preferences during our session but after restarting it forgot ever... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 1154, 'Python': 210, 'TypeScript': 464} [SGR] Primary (detected): JavaScript [SGR] Framework (detected): Express [SGR] Top dirs: ['analysis-reports', 'assets', 'benchmark', 'bin', 'claude-flow-wiki', 'dist-cjs', 'docker', 'docker-test', 'docs', 'examples'] [SGR] Manifests: ['package-lock.json', 'package.json', 'benchmark/requirements.txt', 'benchmark/setup.py', 'benchmark/hive-mind-benchmarks/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1028ms [SGR] Final Language: javascript [SGR] Final Framework: Node.js [SGR] Final Type: library [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['src', 'bin', 'scripts', 'examples', 'docs', 'tests', 'benchmark'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1517ms [SGR] Concepts: ['persistence', 'state management', 'serialization', 'data storage'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to make their AI assistant remember coding preferences permanently after restarting the application, as it currently forgets them. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for saving and loading the AI assistant's learned preferences, and where this information is persisted. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 905ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['docs/', 'examples/', 'benchmark/', 'tests/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: src [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: bin [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: scripts [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: examples [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 1479ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['persistence', 'state', 'serialization', 'storage', 'memory', 'database'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['save', 'load', 'store'] [SGR] Likely files: ['src/api/database-service.ts', 'src/api/database-schema.sql', 'bin/memory.js', 'src/agents/agent-manager.ts', 'src/agents/agent-registry.ts'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 5 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/api/database-service.ts [SGR] [Read] src/api/database-service.ts: 7 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/api/database-schema.sql [SGR] [Read] src/api/database-schema.sql: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: bin/memory.js [SGR] [Read] bin/memory.js: 4 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/agents/agent-manager.ts [SGR] [Read] src/agents/agent-manager.ts: 9 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/agents/agent-registry.ts [SGR] [Read] src/agents/agent-registry.ts: 4 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 24 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2419ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: persistence [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: state [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: serialization [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: storage [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: persistence - Search for primary technical terms related to data [SGR] 2. glob_search: N/A - Find files related to 'database' to understand how [SGR] 3. grep: state - Search for 'persistence' and 'state management' co [SGR] 4. grep: serialization - Search for serialization-related terms to understa [SGR] 5. grep: storage - Search for terms related to memory and storage in [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 persistence /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR] [Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 state /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 serialization /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 43 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 storage /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 244 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 548 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] [Tool] Scope filter removed 389 matches from excluded dirs [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2047ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ["'persistence' option in src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts:403", 'Memory persistence hooks in src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/memory-hooks.ts', 'persistenceEnabled flag in src/__tests__/regression/backward-compatibility.test.ts and src/__tests__/integration/swarm-sdk-integration.test.ts', 'JsonPersistenceManager class in src/core/orchestrator-fixed.ts', 'References to persistence initialization, loading, and saving in src/core/orchestrator-fixed.ts'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1451ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['JsonPersistenceManager class in src/core/orchestrator-fixed.ts', 'Memory persistence hooks in src/agentic-flow-hooks/memory-hooks.ts', 'persistenceEnabled flag in multiple test files', 'persistence option in src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1176ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['state', 'workflowId', 'workflow-hooks.ts', 'types.ts'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2767ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/swarm/json-output-aggregator.ts (circular references in JSON serialization)', 'src/swarm/optimizations/circular-buffer.ts (JSON serialization)', 'src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts (Smart serialization with compression detection)', 'src/cli/simple-commands/hive-mind/core.js (JSON serialization)', 'src/cli/simple-commands/hive-mind/session-manager.js (SerializationError, DeserializationError)', 'bin/hive-mind/core.js (JSON serialization)', 'bin/hive-mind/session-manager.js (SerializationError, DeserializationError)', 'src/verification/checkpoint-manager.ts (serialization)', 'src/mcp/sdk-integration.ts (serialization, process spawning)', 'src/core/logger.ts (error serialization for JSON format)'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 4184ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/hook-manager.ts:727: // Implement cache storage', "src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/index.ts:105: name: 'storage'", "src/task/index.ts:163: throw new Error('TaskCoordinator instance required for memory storage')", 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/workflow-hooks.ts:630: // Create summary of state for storage', 'src/task/README.md:334: - Persistent state storage across agents', 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/memory-hooks.ts:315: // Persist to long-term storage', 'src/resources/resource-manager.ts:187: storageCost: number;', "src/resources/resource-manager.ts:299: export type ResourceType = 'compute' | 'storage' | 'network' | 'memory' | 'gpu' | 'custom';", 'src/resources/resource-manager.ts:1322: storageCost: 0.1,', "docker-test/reasoningbank-validation.mjs:64: results.passed.push('Memory storage with ReasoningBank (3 entries)')"] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1219ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 5866ms [SGR] Summary: To make your AI assistant remember things permanently, you need to implement a persistence mechanism... [SGR] Code locations: 5 [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/core/orchestrator-fixed.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/core/orchestrator-fixed.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/memory-hooks.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/memory-hooks.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/swarm/json-output-aggregator.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/swarm/json-output-aggregator.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts [SGR] [Tool] read_file: src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 5 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 26617ms [SGR] LLM time: 26274ms [SGR] Tool time: 343ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 4, 'glob_search': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → medium → medium → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/claude_flow_memory_system_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/claude_flow_memory_system_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/swarm/memory.ts', 'src/core/DatabaseManager.ts', 'src/cli/simple-commands/init/templates/memory-bank-md.js'] Found: ['src/core/orchestrator-fixed.ts', 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/memory-hooks.ts', 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts', 'src/swarm/json-output-aggregator.ts', 'src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ SUMMARY ================================================================================ django_request_response_lifecycle: recall=50%, time=20406ms django_queryset_lazy_evaluation: recall=100%, time=51045ms gin_route_tree_matching: recall=50%, time=24855ms gin_context_pool_reuse: recall=50%, time=24972ms codeql_dataflow_configuration: ERROR - None codeql_security_query_structure: ERROR - None infinigen_procedural_material_nodes: ERROR - None infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline: recall=75%, time=18951ms qgis_map_rendering_pipeline: ERROR - None qgis_expression_evaluation: ERROR - None claude_flow_agent_coordination: ERROR - None claude_flow_memory_system: ERROR - None Successful: 5/12 Average recall: 65% Average time: 28046ms Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918 Comparison report saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154918/comparison_report.md