Semantic Search MCP Server

/Users/mix0z/Library/Python/3.9/lib/python/site-packages/urllib3/__init__.py:35: NotOpenSSLWarning: urllib3 v2 only supports OpenSSL 1.1.1+, currently the 'ssl' module is compiled with 'LibreSSL 2.8.3'. See: https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/issues/3020 warnings.warn( /Users/mix0z/Library/Python/3.9/lib/python/site-packages/google/api_core/_python_version_support.py:252: FutureWarning: You are using a Python version (3.9.6) past its end of life. Google will update google.api_core with critical bug fixes on a best-effort basis, but not with any other fixes or features. Please upgrade to the latest Python version, or at least Python 3.10, and then update google.api_core. warnings.warn(message, FutureWarning) An error occurred: module 'importlib.metadata' has no attribute 'packages_distributions' Output directory: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700 Loaded 12 questions ================================================================================ Question: django_request_response_lifecycle Repo: django Query: My custom middleware adds a header but sometimes it's missing in the final response. I suspect somet... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 48, 'Python': 2884} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['django', 'docs', 'extras', 'js_tests', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['pyproject.toml', 'package.json', 'tests/admin_scripts/custom_templates/project_template/additional_dir/requirements.txt', 'docs/requirements.txt'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1103ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: Django [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['django/core/', 'django/db/', 'django/http/', 'django/views/', 'django/forms/', 'django/contrib/', 'django/utils/', 'docs/', 'scripts/', 'tests/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1670ms [SGR] Concepts: ['middleware execution order', 'response modification', 'header manipulation'] [SGR] User problem: The user has custom middleware that adds a header to the response, but this header is sometimes missing. They suspect something in the middleware chain is removing it after their middleware has executed. [SGR] What to find: The complete sequence of operations that modify the response object, from the start of the request to the end, to identify what might be removing the header. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: django/core/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: django/db/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: django/http/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: django/views/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3606ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['middleware', 'response', 'request', 'header'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['core', 'handlers'] [SGR] Likely files: ['django/middleware/', 'django/http/response.py', 'django/http/request.py', 'django/core/'] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 3050ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: middleware [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: response [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: request [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: header [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: middleware - Search for the primary term 'middleware' to find f [SGR] 2. grep: response - Search for the primary term 'response' to understa [SGR] 3. grep: request - Search for the primary term 'request' to understan [SGR] 4. grep: header - Search for the primary term 'header' to identify w [SGR] 5. glob_search: N/A - Find files related to Django's core http component [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 middleware /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 response /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 request /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 header /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR-Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2270ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['XFrameOptionsMiddleware in tests/decorators/test_clickjacking.py', 'SecurityMiddleware in django/conf/project_template/project_name/settings.py-tpl', 'SessionMiddleware in django/conf/project_template/project_name/settings.py-tpl', 'CommonMiddleware in django/conf/project_template/project_name/settings.py-tpl', 'CsrfViewMiddleware in django/conf/project_template/project_name/settings.py-tpl', 'AuthenticationMiddleware in django/conf/project_template/project_name/settings.py-tpl', 'MessageMiddleware in django/conf/project_template/project_name/settings.py-tpl'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2021ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['HttpResponse in tests/asgi/urls.py', 'response.raise_for_status() in scripts/manage_translations.py', 'response.json() in scripts/manage_translations.py', 'response.set_cookie() in tests/asgi/urls.py', 'django/template/response.py', 'get_api_response in scripts/manage_translations.py'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 717ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2101ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['django/conf/global_settings.py has multiple settings related to headers, e.g., X-Frame-Options, Content-Type, Date, secure connection headers.', "django/conf/locale/tg/LC_MESSAGES/django.po and django/conf/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/django.po contain translations related to 'header' and 'Referer' header."] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1037ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 2294ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 6210ms [SGR] Summary: The Django request/response cycle involves middleware processing requests and responses in a specifi... [SGR] Code locations: 3 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR-Tool] read_file: django/conf/project_template/project_name/settings.py-tpl [SGR-Tool] read_file: django/conf/project_template/project_name/settings.py-tpl [SGR-Tool] read_file: django/conf/global_settings.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: django/conf/global_settings.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: django/template/response.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: django/template/response.py [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 3 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 26999ms [SGR] LLM time: 26313ms [SGR] Tool time: 687ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 4, 'glob_search': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/django_request_response_lifecycle_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/django_request_response_lifecycle_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['django/core/handlers/base.py', 'django/core/handlers/wsgi.py', 'django/core/handlers/exception.py', 'django/utils/deprecation.py'] Found: ['django/conf/project_template/project_name/settings.py-tpl', 'django/conf/global_settings.py', 'django/template/response.py'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: django_queryset_lazy_evaluation Repo: django Query: I have a view that builds up a complex query with many chained methods, but the page loads instantly... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 48, 'Python': 2884} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['django', 'docs', 'extras', 'js_tests', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['pyproject.toml', 'package.json', 'tests/admin_scripts/custom_templates/project_template/additional_dir/requirements.txt', 'docs/requirements.txt'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 2177ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: Django [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['django/apps/', 'django/conf/', 'django/contrib/', 'django/core/', 'django/db/', 'django/dispatch/', 'django/forms/', 'django/http/', 'django/middleware/', 'django/template/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1451ms [SGR] Concepts: ['method chaining', 'delayed query execution', 'query execution optimization'] [SGR] User problem: The user is experiencing a performance issue where a complex query that should be slow loads instantly, but then takes 5 seconds to execute when the results are iterated over. [SGR] What to find: The code that implements the delayed execution of the query [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: django/apps/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: django/conf/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: django/contrib/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: django/core/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3139ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['QuerySet', 'db', 'execution'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['lazy', 'optimize'] [SGR] Likely files: ['django/db/models/query.py', 'django/db/models/sql/compiler.py'] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 3304ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: QuerySet [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: db [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: execution [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: QuerySet - Search for relevant code [SGR] 2. read_file: N/A - Search for relevant code [SGR] 3. read_file: N/A - Search for relevant code [SGR] 4. grep: db - Search for relevant code [SGR] 5. grep: execution - Search for relevant code [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 QuerySet /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 db /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 execution /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/django/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 851ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1816ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 703ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1177ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1817ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['docs/topics/db/instrumentation.txt has mentions of query execution wrappers', 'docs/topics/db/queries.txt mentions lazy execution of querysets', 'docs/topics/testing/advanced.txt has mentions of test execution'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 899ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 4100ms [SGR] Summary: The delayed execution of a Django QuerySet is implemented through lazy loading. The query is not act... [SGR] Code locations: 1 [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR-Tool] read_file: docs/topics/db/queries.txt [SGR-Tool] read_file: docs/topics/db/queries.txt [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 1 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 22219ms [SGR] LLM time: 21676ms [SGR] Tool time: 544ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 3, 'read_file': 2} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/django_queryset_lazy_evaluation_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/django_queryset_lazy_evaluation_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['django/db/models/query.py', 'django/db/models/query.py'] Found: ['docs/topics/db/queries.txt'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: gin_route_tree_matching Repo: gin Query: I registered /users/new before /users/:id but requests to /users/new are hitting the :id handler. Wh... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Go': 96} [SGR] Primary (detected): Go [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['binding', 'codec', 'docs', 'examples', 'ginS', 'internal', 'render', 'testdata'] [SGR] Manifests: ['go.mod', 'go.sum'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1148ms [SGR] Final Language: go [SGR] Final Framework: Gin [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['binding/', 'codec/', 'docs/', 'examples/', 'ginS/', 'internal/', 'render/', 'testdata/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1675ms [SGR] Concepts: ['route matching', 'pattern overlapping', 'registration order'] [SGR] User problem: Requests to /users/new are being handled by the /users/:id handler even though /users/new was registered first. [SGR] What to find: The code that determines how the framework matches and prioritizes overlapping route patterns, and why the order of registration affects which handler is chosen. [SGR] Question type: why_behavior [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: binding/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: codec/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: docs/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: examples/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3610ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['router', 'path', 'Route', 'tree'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['gin', 'context'] [SGR] Likely files: [] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 1262ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: router [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: path [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: Route [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: tree [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: gin [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: router - Search for the primary term 'router' to understand [SGR] 2. grep: path - Search for the primary term 'path' to understand h [SGR] 3. grep: Route - Search for the primary term 'Route' to find where [SGR] 4. grep: tree - Search for the primary term 'tree' to understand i [SGR] 5. grep: gin - Search for secondary terms 'gin' and 'context' to [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 router /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 path /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 Route /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 tree /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 gin /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1249ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['ginS/gins.go:49: // Group creates a new router group.', 'ginS/gins.go:60: // POST is a shortcut for router.Handle("POST", path, handle)', 'gin.go:106: // RedirectFixedPath if enabled, the router tries to fix the current request path, if no', 'gin.go:117: // HandleMethodNotAllowed if enabled, the router checks if another method is allowed for the'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 4448ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['ginS/gins.go:49: // Group creates a new router group. You should add all the routes that have common middlewares or the same path prefix.', 'ginS/gins.go:60: // POST is a shortcut for router.Handle("POST", path, handle)', 'ginS/gins.go:65: // GET is a shortcut for router.Handle("GET", path, handle)', 'ginS/gins.go:70: // DELETE is a shortcut for router.Handle("DELETE", path, handle)', 'ginS/gins.go:75: // PATCH is a shortcut for router.Handle("PATCH", path, handle)', 'ginS/gins.go:80: // PUT is a shortcut for router.Handle("PUT", path, handle)', 'ginS/gins.go:85: // OPTIONS is a shortcut for router.Handle("OPTIONS", path, handle)', 'ginS/gins.go:90: // HEAD is a shortcut for router.Handle("HEAD", path, handle)', "gin.go:67: // RouteInfo represents a request route's specification which contains method and path and its handler.", 'gin.go:100: // handler for the path with (without) the trailing slash exists.'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2064ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['ginS/gins.go:51: func Group(relativePath string, handlers ...gin.HandlerFunc)', 'ginS/gins.go:56: func Handle(httpMethod, relativePath string, handlers ...gin.HandlerFunc)', 'ginS/gins.go:61: func POST(relativePath string, handlers ...gin.HandlerFunc)', 'ginS/gins.go:124: func Use(middlewares ...gin.HandlerFunc)', 'ginS/gins.go:128: // Routes returns a slice of registered routes.', "gin.go:67: // RouteInfo represents a request route's specification which contains method and path and its handler.", 'gin.go:75: // RoutesInfo defines a RouteInfo slice.'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1790ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['gin.go: methodTrees', 'gin.go: methodTree', 'gin.go: node', 'gin.go: getValue', 'gin.go: addRoute', 'tree_test.go: node', 'tree_test.go: getValue', 'tree_test.go: addRoute'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1990ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['gin.go: package gin', "gin.go: 90: // Engine is the framework's instance, it contains the muxer, middleware and configuration settings.", 'gin.go: 193: // New returns a new blank Engine instance without any middleware attached.', 'gin.go: 235: // Default returns an Engine instance with the Logger and Recovery middleware already attached.'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1232ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 4254ms [SGR] Summary: The Gin framework matches routes based on the order they are registered. More specific routes should... [SGR] Code locations: 2 [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR-Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR-Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR-Tool] read_file: ginS/gins.go [SGR-Tool] read_file: ginS/gins.go [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 2 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 24818ms [SGR] LLM time: 24741ms [SGR] Tool time: 78ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → medium → medium → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/gin_route_tree_matching_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/gin_route_tree_matching_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['tree.go', 'gin.go'] Found: ['gin.go', 'ginS/gins.go'] Matched: ['gin.go'] Recall: 50% ================================================================================ Question: gin_context_pool_reuse Repo: gin Query: I spawned a goroutine from my handler and passed it the request context, but later the data in the c... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Go': 96} [SGR] Primary (detected): Go [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['binding', 'codec', 'docs', 'examples', 'ginS', 'internal', 'render', 'testdata'] [SGR] Manifests: ['go.mod', 'go.sum'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1265ms [SGR] Final Language: go [SGR] Final Framework: Gin [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['binding/', 'codec/', 'docs/', 'examples/', 'ginS/', 'internal/', 'render/', 'testdata/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 693ms [SGR] Concepts: ['goroutine', 'context', 'data corruption', 'background tasks'] [SGR] User problem: The user is experiencing data corruption in the request context when using goroutines for background tasks. [SGR] What to find: The code that handles context propagation and potential race conditions when using contexts with goroutines. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: binding/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: codec/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: docs/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: examples/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2915ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['context', 'goroutine', 'gin', 'ginS'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['sync', 'error'] [SGR] Likely files: ['context.go', 'gin.go'] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 3185ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: context [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: goroutine [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: gin [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: context - Search for how 'context' is used in conjunction wi [SGR] 2. grep: goroutine - Search for usage of 'ginS' which might be related [SGR] 3. grep: gin - Look for patterns related to context data corrupti [SGR] 4. read_file: N/A - Examine 'context.go' for any concurrency-related p [SGR] 5. read_file: N/A - Examine 'gin.go' for context handling within the G [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 context /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 goroutine /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 gin /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/gin/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 19348ms [SGR] Gemini call took 2236ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['gin.go:677: HandleContext re-enters a context that has been rewritten.', 'test_helpers.go:15-29: Tests involving context initialization and usage.', 'auth.go:64, 112: Setting and retrieving values from context using keys like AuthUserKey.', 'context_test.go:9, 38, 319, 3057, 3077, 3095, 3099, 3103, 3111, 3119, 3125, 3131, 3132: Extensive tests for context manipulation, including WithDeadline, WithCancel, and WithValue.', 'context.go:49: Constant ContextKey defined for gin context.'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1309ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['context.go:128: "// This has to be used when the context has to be passed to a goroutine."'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2343ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['gin.go:5: package gin', 'gin.go:50: // HandlerFunc defines the handler used by gin middleware as return value.', "gin.go:90: // Engine is the framework's instance, it contains the muxer, middleware and configuration settings.", 'gin.go:193: // New returns a new blank Engine instance without any middleware attached.', 'gin.go:235: // Default returns an Engine instance with the Logger and Recovery middleware already attached.'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 898ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['file_path is required'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1051ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1470ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 4218ms [SGR] Summary: When passing a Gin request context to a goroutine, the context can become corrupted or contain data ... [SGR] Code locations: 2 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR-Tool] read_file: context.go [SGR-Tool] read_file: context.go [SGR-Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR-Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 2 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 45780ms [SGR] LLM time: 45724ms [SGR] Tool time: 57ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 3, 'read_file': 2} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → medium → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/gin_context_pool_reuse_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/gin_context_pool_reuse_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['gin.go', 'context.go'] Found: ['context.go', 'gin.go'] Matched: ['gin.go', 'context.go'] Recall: 100% ================================================================================ Question: codeql_dataflow_configuration Repo: codeql Query: I wrote a function that validates and escapes user input but CodeQL still reports it as vulnerable. ... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 1955, 'C++': 5, 'C': 5, 'Go': 814, 'Java': 7, 'CodeQL': 2147, 'JavaScript': 12, 'Rust': 118} [SGR] Primary (detected): CodeQL [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Manifests: ['Cargo.toml', 'Cargo.lock', 'misc/legacy-support/python/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/java/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/cpp/qlpack.yml'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 2359ms [SGR] [Override] Language: python → other [SGR] Final Language: other [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1680ms [SGR] Concepts: ['input validation', 'data sanitization', 'taint analysis', 'code scanning'] [SGR] User problem: The user has a validation function that is supposed to prevent vulnerabilities but CodeQL still reports them. They want to know how to correctly mark their function so that CodeQL recognizes it as a source of safe data. [SGR] What to find: How to mark a custom validation function as a source of safe data for CodeQL taint analysis [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: actions [SGR-Tool] list_dir: change-notes [SGR-Tool] list_dir: config [SGR-Tool] list_dir: cpp [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2247ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['validation', 'sanitization', 'taint', 'source'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['actions', 'extractor', 'codeql'] [SGR] Likely files: [] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2963ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: validation [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: sanitization [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: taint [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: source [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: validation - Search for how validation functions are marked to [SGR] 2. grep: sanitization - Search for how sanitization functions are marked t [SGR] 3. grep: taint - Search for how sources of tainted data are identif [SGR] 4. grep: source - Search for information regarding taint analysis in [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 validation /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 sanitization /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 taint /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 source /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 631ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3326ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['The search results indicate that CodeQL', 'recognizes additional sanitization patterns for taint tracking, but they do not specify how to explicitly mark a custom function as a sanitization function.'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3276ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['codeql-workspace.yml:12: - "cpp/ql/test/query-tests/Security/CWE/CWE-190/semmle/tainted/qlpack.yml"', 'java/old-change-notes/2021-03-01-fluent-interface-data-flow.md:2: * The data-flow library now recognises more side-effects of method chaining (e.g. `someObject.setX(clean).setY(tainted).setZ...` having a side-effect', 'java/documentation/library-coverage/coverage.csv:1: package,sink,source,summary,sink:bean-validation,sink:command-injection,sink:credentials-key,sink:credentials-password,sink:credentials-username,sink:', 'csharp/old-change-notes/2021-03-01-fluent-interface-data-flow.md:2: * The data-flow library now recognises more side-effects of method chaining (e.g. `someObject.setX(clean).setY(tainted).setZ...` having a side-effect', 'csharp/old-change-notes/2021-06-24-dataflow-implicit-reads.md:2: * The DataFlow libraries have been augmented with support for `Configuration`-specific in-place read steps at, for example, sinks and custom taint ste'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3672ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['config/identical-files.json:231: "java/ql/src/experimental/Security/CWE/CWE-400/LocalThreadResourceAbuse.qhelp"', 'config/identical-files.json:232: "java/ql/src/experimental/Security/CWE/CWE-400/ThreadResourceAbuse.qhelp"', 'javascript/old-change-notes/2021-02-09-form-parsers.md:2: * Server side form parsing libraries are now recognized as source of remote user input.', 'actions/ql/src/Debug/partial.ql:19: predicate isSource(DataFlow::Node source)', 'java/old-change-notes/2021-08-12-jax-rs-filter-sources.md:2: * Remote information sources relating to JAX-RS request filters are now recognised.', 'javascript/old-change-notes/2021-02-18-next-js.md:3: Taint sources, sinks, and steps are now recognized.', 'ruby/ql/src/utils/modeleditor/ModelEditor.qll:125: /** Holds if this API is a known source. */', 'ruby/ql/src/utils/modeleditor/ModelEditor.qll:152: this.isSource() and result = "source"'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1144ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 1762ms [SGR] Summary: CodeQL does not have a direct way to mark custom validation functions as sanitizers. While it recogn... [SGR] Code locations: 2 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR-Tool] read_file: actions/ql/src/Debug/partial.ql [SGR-Tool] read_file: actions/ql/src/Debug/partial.ql [SGR-Tool] read_file: ruby/ql/src/utils/modeleditor/ModelEditor.qll [SGR-Tool] read_file: ruby/ql/src/utils/modeleditor/ModelEditor.qll [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 2 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 28354ms [SGR] LLM time: 23345ms [SGR] Tool time: 5009ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 4} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → medium → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/codeql_dataflow_configuration_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/codeql_dataflow_configuration_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/dataflow/Configuration.qll', 'javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/dataflow/TaintTracking.qll', 'docs/codeql/codeql-language-guides/analyzing-data-flow-in-javascript-and-typescript.rst'] Found: ['actions/ql/src/Debug/partial.ql', 'ruby/ql/src/utils/modeleditor/ModelEditor.qll'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: codeql_security_query_structure Repo: codeql Query: I want to find places where data from HTTP request parameters ends up being written to the page with... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 1955, 'C++': 5, 'C': 5, 'Go': 814, 'Java': 7, 'CodeQL': 2147, 'JavaScript': 12, 'Rust': 118} [SGR] Primary (detected): CodeQL [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Manifests: ['Cargo.toml', 'Cargo.lock', 'misc/legacy-support/python/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/java/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/cpp/qlpack.yml'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 963ms [SGR] [Override] Language: python → other [SGR] Final Language: other [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 2310ms [SGR] Concepts: ['http request parameters', 'unencoded output', 'data tracing', 'security vulnerability'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to find instances where data from HTTP request parameters is written to a page without proper encoding, potentially leading to security vulnerabilities. [SGR] What to find: Code that writes unencoded data from HTTP request parameters to the page, tracing the data flow from input to output. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: actions [SGR-Tool] list_dir: change-notes [SGR-Tool] list_dir: config [SGR-Tool] list_dir: cpp [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2673ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['http', 'request', 'parameter', 'trace', 'security', 'vulnerability', 'unencoded'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['actions', 'config', 'go', 'java'] [SGR] Likely files: [] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2279ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: http [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: request [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 3 [SGR] 1. grep: http - Search for primary technical terms related to HTTP [SGR] 2. grep: request - Search for terms related to data tracing and secur [SGR] 3. glob_search: N/A - Find files that might be related to HTTP request h [SGR] Executing 3 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 http /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 request /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/codeql/repo [SGR-Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 941ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 684ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 812ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1292ms [SGR] LLM decided: ready to generate answer [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 853ms [SGR] Summary: I cannot answer your question because the search terms provided did not yield any relevant results. ... [SGR] Code locations: 0 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 3 [SGR] Total time: 15733ms [SGR] LLM time: 13064ms [SGR] Tool time: 2669ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 2, 'glob_search': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/codeql_security_query_structure_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/codeql_security_query_structure_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/security/dataflow/DomBasedXssQuery.qll', 'javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/security/dataflow/Xss.qll', 'javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/security/dataflow/ReflectedXssCustomizations.qll'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: infinigen_procedural_material_nodes Repo: infinigen Query: I want to create materials that look different each time based on a seed value - like varied wood gr... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 878, 'C++': 46, 'C': 45} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['docs', 'infinigen', 'infinigen_examples', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'pyproject.toml', 'setup.py'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1481ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: other [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen/core/', 'infinigen/datagen/', 'infinigen/terrain/', 'infinigen/tools/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_indoor/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_nature/', 'infinigen_examples/constraints/', 'infinigen_examples/util/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 848ms [SGR] Concepts: ['procedural generation', 'randomization', 'seed value', 'rendering', 'material construction', 'Blender integration'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to create randomized visual appearances for materials, similar to natural variations like wood grain or rust, and wants to understand how this is achieved and connected to Blender rendering. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for generating randomized material appearances based on a seed value and how this process is integrated with Blender for rendering. [SGR] Question type: how_it_works [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: infinigen/assets/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: infinigen/core/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: infinigen/datagen/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: infinigen/terrain/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3505ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['material', 'asset_parameters', 'randomization', 'seed', 'render'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['composition', 'materials', 'blender'] [SGR] Likely files: ['infinigen/assets/materials/', 'infinigen/assets/composition/', 'infinigen/core/rendering/', 'infinigen_examples/asset_parameters.py', 'scripts/eevee_render.py', 'infinigen/core/util/blender.py'] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2551ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: material [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: asset_parameters [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: randomization [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: seed [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: render [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: material - Search for the term 'randomization' in the provide [SGR] 2. grep: asset_parameters - Search for the term 'seed' in the provided files a [SGR] 3. grep: randomization - Search for the term 'material' in the provided fil [SGR] 4. grep: seed - Search for the term 'render' in the provided files [SGR] 5. grep: render - Search for the term 'asset_parameters' in the prov [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 material /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 asset_parameters /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 randomization /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 seed /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 render /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 857ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1317ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ["Found references to 'asset_parameters' in 3 files: infinigen_examples/generate_asset_parameters.py, infinigen/core/placement/factory.py, and infinigen/assets/objects/trees/generate.py."] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1699ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['changelog.md: 2.3.0 - Add support for automatic randomization based on labels', 'changelog.md: 2.4.0 - Add randomization support for Nodes.Integer, add ValueError for commonly missed ATTRS_AVAILABLE'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1590ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['The term "seed" appears frequently in `infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py`, indicating its use in managing scene generation processes.', 'The `scripts/rebuttal.sh` file shows examples of running generation tasks with specific seeds (`--seed 0`, `--seed 1`, etc.).'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3176ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['References to "render" in multiple files including infinigen/datagen/states.py, infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py, infinigen/datagen/job_funcs.py, infinigen/datagen/configs/data_schema/stereo_1h_jobs.gin, infinigen/datagen/manage_jobs.py.', 'Functions like `queue_render` and parameters like `render_frame_range` suggest rendering is a core part of the system.', 'The use of `render.render_image_func` indicates a specific mechanism for image rendering.'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 779ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 4708ms [SGR] Summary: The system utilizes a seed value to control the randomization of material appearances, creating vari... [SGR] Code locations: 5 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/generate_asset_parameters.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/generate_asset_parameters.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: scripts/rebuttal.sh [SGR-Tool] read_file: scripts/rebuttal.sh [SGR-Tool] read_file: changelog.md [SGR] Skipping non-existent file: changelog.md [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/states.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/states.py [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 4 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 22780ms [SGR] LLM time: 22572ms [SGR] Tool time: 208ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → medium → low → medium → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/infinigen_procedural_material_nodes_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/infinigen_procedural_material_nodes_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['infinigen/core/nodes/node_wrangler.py', 'infinigen/core/nodes/node_utils.py', 'infinigen/core/surface.py'] Found: ['infinigen_examples/generate_asset_parameters.py', 'infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py', 'scripts/rebuttal.sh', 'infinigen/datagen/states.py'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline Repo: infinigen Query: When generating a nature scene, objects need to be distributed realistically - grass under trees, ro... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 878, 'C++': 46, 'C': 45} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['docs', 'infinigen', 'infinigen_examples', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'pyproject.toml', 'setup.py'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1215ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen/core/', 'infinigen/datagen/', 'infinigen/infinigen_gpl/', 'infinigen/OcMesher/', 'infinigen/terrain/', 'infinigen/tools/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_indoor/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_nature/', 'infinigen_examples/constraints/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1386ms [SGR] Concepts: ['spatial constraints', 'object distribution', 'scene generation pipeline', 'object density'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to understand how the system ensures realistic object distribution in a generated nature scene, adhering to spatial constraints like placing objects appropriately on the ground and avoiding unrealistic placements. [SGR] What to find: The code that enforces spatial constraints and manages object density during scene generation. [SGR] Question type: how_it_works [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: infinigen/assets/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: infinigen/core/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: infinigen/datagen/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: infinigen/infinigen_gpl/ [SGR] Explored 3 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3693ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['constraint', 'placement', 'density', 'scene', 'generate'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['distribution', 'pipeline'] [SGR] Likely files: ['infinigen/core/constraints/', 'infinigen/core/placement/', 'infinigen/assets/fluid/'] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 3022ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: constraint [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: placement [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: density [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: scene [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: constraint - Search for the term 'constraint' to understand how [SGR] 2. grep: placement - Search for the term 'placement' to find logic rela [SGR] 3. grep: density - Search for the term 'density' to investigate how o [SGR] 4. grep: scene - Search for the term 'scene generation' to find the [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 constraint /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 placement /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 density /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 scene /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/infinigen/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3311ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['docs/HelloRoom.md:129: Configuring `compose_indoors()` and ``restrict_solving()` via gin allows you to only solve sub-parts of the default constraint problem:', "docs/HelloRoom.md:148: - `restrict_solving.consgraph_filters=['counter','sink']` says to throw out any `constraints` or `score_terms` keys from `home_furniture_constrain", 'infinigen_examples/configs_indoor/studio.gin:1: home_room_constraints.has_fewer_rooms = True', 'docs/CHANGELOG.md:57: - Add indoor scene generation system, including constraint language and solver', 'infinigen/core/placement/factory.py:78: has_sensitive_constraint = any(', 'infinigen/core/placement/factory.py:79: c.type in ["FOLLOW_PATH"] for c in obj.constraints', 'infinigen/core/placement/factory.py:88: "location-sensitive constraint, typically a follow curve"'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1516ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/placement.py', 'infinigen_examples/generate_individual_assets.py', 'infinigen/assets/placement/floating_objects.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/split_in_view.py'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2028ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ["infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py contains multiple references to 'density', 'overall_density', and 'taper_density'"] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1708ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['infinigen/datagen/states.py includes functions related to scene management and state tracking (e.g., get_scene_state, on_scene_termination).', 'infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py contains functions for cleanup and monitoring of scene termination.'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1301ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 4093ms [SGR] Summary: The pipeline handles spatial constraints and object density through a placement system. `infinigen/c... [SGR] Code locations: 5 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/factory.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/factory.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/assets/placement/floating_objects.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/assets/placement/floating_objects.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/states.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/states.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py [SGR-Tool] read_file: infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 5 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 23479ms [SGR] LLM time: 23325ms [SGR] Tool time: 154ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 4} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → medium → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['infinigen/core/placement/factory.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/placement.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/density.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py'] Found: ['infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/factory.py', 'infinigen/assets/placement/floating_objects.py', 'infinigen/datagen/states.py', 'infinigen/datagen/monitor_tasks.py'] Matched: ['infinigen/core/placement/factory.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py'] Recall: 50% ================================================================================ Question: qgis_map_rendering_pipeline Repo: QGIS Query: When I have 10 heavy layers and pan the map, the UI stays responsive and layers appear progressively... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 3312} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['cmake', 'cmake_templates', 'debian', 'doc', 'editors', 'external', 'i18n', 'images', 'linux', 'ms-windows'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'setup.cfg', '.docker/qgis_resources/requirements.txt'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1011ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['cmake', 'cmake_templates', 'debian', 'doc', 'editors', 'external', 'i18n', 'images', 'linux', 'ms-windows'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1324ms [SGR] Concepts: ['progressive rendering', 'background drawing', 'UI responsiveness', 'map panning', 'layer management'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to understand how the application maintains UI responsiveness and progressively displays layers when panning a map with many heavy layers. [SGR] What to find: the code responsible for splitting up the drawing work and coordinating background drawing operations. [SGR] Question type: how_it_works [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: cmake [SGR-Tool] list_dir: cmake_templates [SGR-Tool] list_dir: debian [SGR-Tool] list_dir: doc [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2264ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['rendering', 'drawing', 'layer', 'map'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['render', 'draw', 'manager'] [SGR] Likely files: ['src/core/', 'src/gui/'] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2295ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: rendering [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: drawing [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: layer [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: map [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: render [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: rendering - Search for the primary term 'rendering' to underst [SGR] 2. grep: drawing - Search for the primary term 'drawing' to understan [SGR] 3. grep: layer - Search for the primary term 'layer' to understand [SGR] 4. grep: map - Search for the primary term 'map' to understand ma [SGR] 5. grep: render - Search for the pattern 'progressive.*render' to fi [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 rendering /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 drawing /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 layer /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 map /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 render /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1280ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/3d/qgsshadowsettings.h', 'doc/api_break.dox', 'src/3d/qgsoffscreen3dengine.cpp', 'src/3d/qgsannotationlayer3drenderer.h', 'src/3d/qgstiledscenelayer3drenderer.h'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 768ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 985ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3317ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/process/qgsprocess.cpp:345', 'src/process/qgsprocess.cpp:540', 'linux/org.qgis.qgis.desktop.in:11', 'linux/org.qgis.qgis.desktop.in:12', 'src/customwidgets/qgsprocess.cpp:35', 'src/customwidgets/qgsextentgroupboxplugin.cpp:76', 'src/customwidgets/qgsextentgroupboxplugin.cpp:81', 'src/server/qgsconfigcache.cpp:202', 'src/plugins/geometry_checker/qgsgeometrycheckerfixsummarydialog.cpp:25', 'src/analysis/interpolation/qgsinterpolator.h:125'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 879ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1150ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 6168ms [SGR] Summary: The provided search results do not contain specific information about how the application splits up ... [SGR] Code locations: 7 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/3d/qgsshadowsettings.h [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/3d/qgsshadowsettings.h [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/3d/qgsoffscreen3dengine.cpp [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/3d/qgsoffscreen3dengine.cpp [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/3d/qgsannotationlayer3drenderer.h [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/3d/qgsannotationlayer3drenderer.h [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/3d/qgstiledscenelayer3drenderer.h [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/3d/qgstiledscenelayer3drenderer.h [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/process/qgsprocess.cpp [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/process/qgsprocess.cpp [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/server/qgsconfigcache.cpp [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/server/qgsconfigcache.cpp [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/analysis/interpolation/qgsinterpolator.h [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/analysis/interpolation/qgsinterpolator.h [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 7 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 26233ms [SGR] LLM time: 21632ms [SGR] Tool time: 4601ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/qgis_map_rendering_pipeline_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/qgis_map_rendering_pipeline_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/core/maprenderer/qgsmaprendererparalleljob.cpp', 'src/core/maprenderer/qgsmaprendererjob.cpp', 'src/gui/qgsmapcanvas.cpp'] Found: ['src/3d/qgsshadowsettings.h', 'src/3d/qgsoffscreen3dengine.cpp', 'src/3d/qgsannotationlayer3drenderer.h', 'src/3d/qgstiledscenelayer3drenderer.h', 'src/process/qgsprocess.cpp'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: qgis_expression_evaluation Repo: QGIS Query: I have a complex formula in my label settings that calculates text from multiple fields and geometry... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 3312} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['cmake', 'cmake_templates', 'debian', 'doc', 'editors', 'external', 'i18n', 'images', 'linux', 'ms-windows'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'setup.cfg', '.docker/qgis_resources/requirements.txt'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1552ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: QGIS [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['cmake/', 'cmake_templates/', 'debian/', 'doc/', 'editors/', 'external/', 'i18n/', 'images/', 'linux/', 'ms-windows/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 913ms [SGR] Concepts: ['formula calculation', 'performance optimization', 'label settings', 'large datasets'] [SGR] User problem: The user is experiencing slow rendering performance on large datasets due to a complex formula calculation in label settings and wants to identify where this calculation occurs and how to optimize it. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for calculating the formula in label settings and potential optimization strategies. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: cmake/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: cmake_templates/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: debian/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: doc/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3128ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['label', 'formula', 'dataset'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['settings', 'optimize'] [SGR] Likely files: ['qgis/core/', 'qgis/gui/'] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2352ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: label [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: formula [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: dataset [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: settings [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: label - Search for the term 'formula' in label settings wi [SGR] 2. grep: formula - Search for 'formula' and 'calculation' within the [SGR] 3. grep: dataset - Search for 'optimize' and 'performance' in conjunc [SGR] 4. grep: settings - Search for how 'datasets' are processed in relatio [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 label /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 formula /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 dataset /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 settings /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/QGIS/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1114ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3924ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['resources/opencl_programs/hillshade_renderer.cl:60: // Fast formula from GDAL DEM', 'resources/opencl_programs/calcfirstder.cl:5: //the basic formula would be simple, but we need to test for nodata values...', 'ChangeLog:2732: This is the same formula as the one used to compute band statistics on', 'ChangeLog:7903: This way, the formula is only defined once.', 'ChangeLog:8982: Fix 3D zoom wheel distance formula', 'ChangeLog:8993: Fix projection matrix formula', 'ChangeLog:44107: QgsLineSegment: uses distance method from qgspoint instead of direct cartesian formula', 'ChangeLog:44115: qgscircularstring: uses distance method from qgspoint instead of direct cartesian formula', 'ChangeLog:44123: qgsdualedgetriangulation: uses distance method from qgspoint instead of direct cartesian formula', 'ChangeLog:53776: use plain formula instead of scale_exp expression function in the vector'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 865ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 625ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 801ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 3379ms [SGR] Summary: The provided search results do not contain specific information about where complex formula calculat... [SGR] Code locations: 0 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 21325ms [SGR] LLM time: 18873ms [SGR] Tool time: 2452ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 4} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → medium → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/qgis_expression_evaluation_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/qgis_expression_evaluation_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/core/expression/qgsexpression.cpp', 'src/core/qgsexpressioncontext.h', 'src/core/labeling/qgspallabeling.cpp'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: claude_flow_agent_coordination Repo: claude-flow Query: I started multiple workers to process different parts of a project but two of them tried to modify t... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 1154, 'Python': 210, 'TypeScript': 464} [SGR] Primary (detected): JavaScript [SGR] Framework (detected): Express [SGR] Top dirs: ['analysis-reports', 'assets', 'benchmark', 'bin', 'claude-flow-wiki', 'dist-cjs', 'docker', 'docker-test', 'docs', 'examples'] [SGR] Manifests: ['package-lock.json', 'package.json', 'benchmark/requirements.txt', 'benchmark/setup.py', 'benchmark/hive-mind-benchmarks/requirements.txt'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1636ms [SGR] Final Language: javascript [SGR] Final Framework: Express [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['benchmark', 'bin', 'docker', 'docs', 'examples', 'hooks', 'models', 'scripts', 'src'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 813ms [SGR] Concepts: ['concurrency control', 'file locking', 'inter-process communication', 'race conditions'] [SGR] User problem: Multiple workers modifying the same file simultaneously, causing data corruption. [SGR] What to find: Code that handles synchronization between workers to prevent simultaneous file access and conflicts. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: benchmark [SGR-Tool] list_dir: bin [SGR-Tool] list_dir: docker [SGR-Tool] list_dir: docs [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2142ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['coordination', 'concurrent-display', 'parallel', 'worker'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['lock', 'ipc'] [SGR] Likely files: ['bin/coordination.js', 'benchmark/docs/PARALLEL_EXECUTION.md'] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 1599ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: coordination [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: concurrent-display [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: parallel [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: worker [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: lock [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: coordination - Search for the primary term 'worker' to find where [SGR] 2. grep: concurrent-display - Search for the primary term 'coordination' to find [SGR] 3. grep: parallel - Search for the primary term 'parallel' to find cod [SGR] 4. grep: worker - Search for the secondary term 'lock' to find any l [SGR] 5. grep: lock - Search for the secondary term 'ipc' to find any in [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 coordination /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 concurrent-display /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 parallel /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 worker /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 lock /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1651ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/templates/claude-optimized/manifest.json:90', 'src/execution/agent-executor.ts:3', 'hooks/bash-hook-hybrid.sh:2', 'hooks/bash-hook-hybrid.sh:33', 'package.json:47', 'package.json:76', 'tests/performance/benchmark.test.ts:7', 'tests/performance/benchmark.test.ts:205', 'src/sdk/claude-flow-mcp-integration.ts:7', 'src/sdk/claude-flow-mcp-integration.ts:136'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1025ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/cli/simple-commands/automation-executor.js:778', 'bin/automation-executor.js:778', 'dist-cjs/src/cli/simple-commands/concurrent-display.js.map:1', 'dist-cjs/src/cli/simple-commands/automation-executor.js.map:1', 'dist-cjs/src/cli/simple-commands/concurrent-display.js:254'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3198ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/hook-manager.ts:617: if (stage.parallel) {', 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/hook-manager.ts:618: // Execute hooks in parallel', 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/index.ts:88: parallel: true,', 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/index.ts:107: parallel: true,', 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/index.ts:112: parallel: true,', "src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/performance-hooks.ts:433: type: 'parallel',", 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts:378: parallel: boolean;', "src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/workflow-hooks.ts:609: case 'parallel':", 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/workflow-hooks.ts:610: optimizedState.parallelSteps = [', 'scripts/test-swarm.ts:88: "--parallel"'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1452ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ["'worker_threads' imported in src/swarm/prompt-copying-README.md", 'Worker class imported in src/swarm/prompt-copying-README.md', "copy-worker.ts file uses 'worker_threads'", 'workerData used in src/swarm/workers/copy-worker.ts'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3749ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts:344: // Async MCP storage (non-blocking)', 'src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts:456: // Fallback to MCP memory (async, non-blocking)', "src/api/database-schema.sql:88: status ENUM('available', 'allocated', 'locked', 'error') DEFAULT 'available'", 'src/maestro/maestro-types.ts:189: blocking: boolean; // Does failure block progression?', 'src/api/auth-service.ts:18: lockoutDuration?: number; // Default: 900000 (15 minutes)', 'src/api/auth-service.ts:32: lockedUntil?: Date;', 'src/api/auth-service.ts:160: // Check if account is locked', 'src/api/auth-service.ts:161: if (user.lockedUntil && user.lockedUntil > new Date()) {', "src/api/auth-service.ts:162: throw new AuthenticationError('Account locked due to too many failed attempts');", 'src/api/auth-service.ts:180: user.lockedUntil = undefined;'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1120ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 1255ms [SGR] Summary: The provided search results do not contain explicit information on how to implement locking mechanis... [SGR] Code locations: 0 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 20413ms [SGR] LLM time: 19819ms [SGR] Tool time: 594ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → medium → medium → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/claude_flow_agent_coordination_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/claude_flow_agent_coordination_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/task/coordination.ts', 'src/cli/simple-commands/inject-memory-protocol.js', 'src/resources/resource-manager.ts'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: claude_flow_memory_system Repo: claude-flow Query: My AI assistant learned my coding preferences during our session but after restarting it forgot ever... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR-Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 1154, 'Python': 210, 'TypeScript': 464} [SGR] Primary (detected): JavaScript [SGR] Framework (detected): Express [SGR] Top dirs: ['analysis-reports', 'assets', 'benchmark', 'bin', 'claude-flow-wiki', 'dist-cjs', 'docker', 'docker-test', 'docs', 'examples'] [SGR] Manifests: ['package-lock.json', 'package.json', 'benchmark/requirements.txt', 'benchmark/setup.py', 'benchmark/hive-mind-benchmarks/requirements.txt'] [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1378ms [SGR] Final Language: javascript [SGR] Final Framework: Node.js [SGR] Final Type: library [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['analysis-reports/', 'assets/', 'benchmark/', 'bin/', 'docker/', 'docs/', 'examples/', 'hooks/', 'models/', 'patches/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 926ms [SGR] Concepts: ['persistence', 'state management', 'serialization', 'data storage'] [SGR] User problem: The user's AI assistant forgets learned coding preferences after restarting and wants to make this information persistent. [SGR] What to find: The location where the AI assistant's learned preferences are saved. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR-Tool] list_dir: . [SGR-Tool] list_dir: analysis-reports/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: assets/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: benchmark/ [SGR-Tool] list_dir: bin/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3634ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['memory', 'persistence', 'serialization'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['db-optimizer', 'session-manager'] [SGR] Likely files: ['hive-mind/memory.js', 'hive-mind/db-optimizer.js', 'hive-mind/session-manager.js'] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2224ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: memory [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: persistence [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: serialization [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: memory - Search for 'persistence' in the likely files to un [SGR] 2. grep: persistence - Search for 'serialization' in the likely files to [SGR] 3. grep: serialization - Search for 'memory' in the likely files to find th [SGR] 4. read_file: N/A - Read the content of 'hive-mind/memory.js' to under [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 memory /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 persistence /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR-Tool] grep: rg --json -C 3 -m 50 serialization /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/data/issues/claude-flow/repo [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 3067ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ["src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/hook-manager.ts:537: case 'memory':", 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/hook-manager.ts:563: // Implement memory side effect processing', 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/hook-manager.ts:564: // This would integrate with the memory service', "src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/index.ts:10: import { registerMemoryHooks } from './memory-hooks.js';", "src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/index.ts:19: export * from './memory-hooks.js';", 'src/types/interfaces.ts:173: memory: number;', 'src/types/interfaces.ts:202: memoryUsage: number;', 'CHANGELOG.md:94: - SQLite backend (.swarm/memory.db) with JSON fallback', 'CHANGELOG.md:95: - ReasoningBank integration for semantic memory'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1282ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['docs/TRANSFORMER_INITIALIZATION_ISSUE.md:110: - SQLite database persistence', 'docs/AGENTIC_FLOW_INTEGRATION_REVIEW.md:213: - ✅ `tests/integration/mcp-pattern-persistence.test.js`', "src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts:403: persistence: 'session' | 'persistent';", "src/swarm/mcp-integration-wrapper.ts:642: if (toolName.includes('memory_')) return 'memory-persistence';", "src/hive-mind/memory.js:18: persistenceDir: config.persistenceDir || './data/hive-memory'", 'src/hive-mind/memory.js:67: // Create persistence directory', 'docs/reports/validation/REASONINGBANK-v1.5.13-VALIDATION.md:88: ✅ Database persistence: .swarm/memory.db exists', 'docs/releases/ALPHA_TAG_UPDATE.md:103: - ✅ Pattern persistence (neural_train now saves data)'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2032ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts:306: // Smart serialization with compression detection', 'docs/reasoningbank/google-research.md:760: - Includes JSON serialization + embedding storage', 'docs/reasoningbank/google-research.md:772: - Includes JSON parsing and BLOB deserialization', 'docs/reasoningbank/google-research.md:898: 2. **Embedding Deserialization** (included in retrieval time)', 'docs/integrations/reasoningbank/REASONINGBANK-VALIDATION.md:103: - `upsertMemory()` - Memory storage with JSON serialization', "src/cli/simple-commands/hive-mind/session-manager.js:13: import { SerializationError, DeserializationError } from '../../../memory/adva"] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1415ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Error: file_path is required'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 819ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 6589ms [SGR] Summary: The AI assistant... [SGR] Code locations: 5 [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/hive-mind/memory.js [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/hive-mind/memory.js [SGR-Tool] read_file: CHANGELOG.md [SGR-Tool] read_file: CHANGELOG.md [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts [SGR-Tool] read_file: src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts [SGR-Tool] read_file: docs/integrations/reasoningbank/REASONINGBANK-VALIDATION.md [SGR-Tool] read_file: docs/integrations/reasoningbank/REASONINGBANK-VALIDATION.md [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 5 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 24183ms [SGR] LLM time: 23549ms [SGR] Tool time: 634ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 3, 'read_file': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: medium → medium → medium → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/claude_flow_memory_system_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/claude_flow_memory_system_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/swarm/memory.ts', 'src/core/DatabaseManager.ts', 'src/cli/simple-commands/init/templates/memory-bank-md.js'] Found: ['src/hive-mind/memory.js', 'CHANGELOG.md', 'src/services/agentic-flow-hooks/types.ts', 'src/hive-mind/core/Memory.ts', 'docs/integrations/reasoningbank/REASONINGBANK-VALIDATION.md'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ SUMMARY ================================================================================ django_request_response_lifecycle: ERROR - None django_queryset_lazy_evaluation: ERROR - None gin_route_tree_matching: recall=50%, time=24818ms gin_context_pool_reuse: recall=100%, time=45780ms codeql_dataflow_configuration: ERROR - None codeql_security_query_structure: ERROR - None infinigen_procedural_material_nodes: ERROR - None infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline: recall=50%, time=23479ms qgis_map_rendering_pipeline: ERROR - None qgis_expression_evaluation: ERROR - None claude_flow_agent_coordination: ERROR - None claude_flow_memory_system: ERROR - None Successful: 3/12 Average recall: 67% Average time: 31359ms Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700 Comparison report saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_150700/comparison_report.md