Semantic Search MCP Server

/Users/mix0z/Library/Python/3.9/lib/python/site-packages/urllib3/__init__.py:35: NotOpenSSLWarning: urllib3 v2 only supports OpenSSL 1.1.1+, currently the 'ssl' module is compiled with 'LibreSSL 2.8.3'. See: https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/issues/3020 warnings.warn( /Users/mix0z/Library/Python/3.9/lib/python/site-packages/google/api_core/_python_version_support.py:252: FutureWarning: You are using a Python version (3.9.6) past its end of life. Google will update google.api_core with critical bug fixes on a best-effort basis, but not with any other fixes or features. Please upgrade to the latest Python version, or at least Python 3.10, and then update google.api_core. warnings.warn(message, FutureWarning) An error occurred: module 'importlib.metadata' has no attribute 'packages_distributions' Output directory: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332 Loaded 12 questions ================================================================================ Question: django_request_response_lifecycle Repo: django Query: My custom middleware adds a header but sometimes it's missing in the final response. I suspect somet... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 48, 'Python': 2884} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['django', 'docs', 'extras', 'js_tests', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['pyproject.toml', 'package.json', 'tests/admin_scripts/custom_templates/project_template/additional_dir/requirements.txt', 'docs/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1130ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: Django [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['django/apps', 'django/conf', 'django/contrib', 'django/core', 'django/db', 'django/http', 'django/middleware', 'django/template', 'django/views', 'docs'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1708ms [SGR] Concepts: ['custom middleware', 'response headers', 'request lifecycle', 'middleware execution order'] [SGR] User problem: The user is reporting that a custom middleware adding a header is sometimes not present in the final response, suspecting it might be removed by subsequent middleware. [SGR] What to find: The complete sequence of what modifies the response object, from the start of the request to the end. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 2117ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['fixtures/', 'mocks/', 'benchmarks/', 'samples/', 'spec/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['django/core', 'django/middleware', 'django/http'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/apps [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/conf [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/contrib [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/core [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3857ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['middleware', 'response', 'request', 'http', 'middleware'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['lifecycle', 'header'] [SGR] Likely files: ['django/http/', 'django/middleware/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 2 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/http/__init__.py [SGR] [Read] django/http/__init__.py: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/http/cookie.py [SGR] [Read] django/http/cookie.py: 1 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/http/multipartparser.py [SGR] [Read] django/http/multipartparser.py: 6 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/__init__.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/cache.py [SGR] [Read] django/middleware/cache.py: 9 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/clickjacking.py [SGR] [Read] django/middleware/clickjacking.py: 3 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 19 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 1165ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: middleware [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: response [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: request [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: http [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: middleware - Search for 'middleware' in the django/http and dja [SGR] 2. grep: response - Search for 'response' in the django/http and djang [SGR] 3. grep: request - Search for 'header' in the django/http and django/ [SGR] 4. grep: http - Search for 'request' in the django/http and django [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: middleware - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: response - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: request - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: http - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 703ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 938ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1250ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2306ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ["method 'cache' in django/middleware/cache.py:157", "method 'process_request' in django/middleware/cache.py:160", "class 'XFrameOptionsMiddleware' in django/middleware/clickjacking.py:12", "method 'process_response' in django/middleware/clickjacking.py:25", "method 'get_xframe_options_value' in django/middleware/clickjacking.py:40"] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1405ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 2286ms [SGR] Summary: The Django response object goes through a middleware lifecycle. Your custom middleware likely adds t... [SGR] Code locations: 2 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/clickjacking.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/clickjacking.py [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/cache.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/middleware/cache.py [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 2 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 19173ms [SGR] LLM time: 19173ms [SGR] Tool time: 1ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 4} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/django_request_response_lifecycle_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/django_request_response_lifecycle_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['django/core/handlers/base.py', 'django/core/handlers/wsgi.py', 'django/core/handlers/exception.py', 'django/utils/deprecation.py'] Found: ['django/middleware/clickjacking.py', 'django/middleware/cache.py'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: django_queryset_lazy_evaluation Repo: django Query: I have a view that builds up a complex query with many chained methods, but the page loads instantly... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 48, 'Python': 2884} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['django', 'docs', 'extras', 'js_tests', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['pyproject.toml', 'package.json', 'tests/admin_scripts/custom_templates/project_template/additional_dir/requirements.txt', 'docs/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1996ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: Django [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['django/apps/', 'django/conf/', 'django/contrib/', 'django/core/', 'django/db/', 'django/dispatch/', 'django/forms/', 'django/http/', 'django/middleware/', 'django/tasks/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1112ms [SGR] Concepts: ['query optimization', 'lazy evaluation', 'deferred execution', 'performance analysis'] [SGR] User problem: The user observes a delay in query execution only when iterating over results, despite the initial query building appearing instantaneous. They suspect this indicates a delayed execution mechanism. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for the delayed execution of the complex query, which is triggered upon iteration. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 2482ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['fixtures/', 'mocks/', 'benchmarks/', 'samples/', 'spec/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['django/db/models'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/apps/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/conf/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/contrib/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: django/core/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2626ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['db', 'QuerySet', 'deferred execution', 'lazy evaluation'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['core', 'utils'] [SGR] Likely files: ['django/db/', 'django/core/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 2 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/db/__init__.py [SGR] [Read] django/db/__init__.py: 2 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/db/transaction.py [SGR] [Read] django/db/transaction.py: 17 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/db/utils.py [SGR] [Read] django/db/utils.py: 21 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/__init__.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/asgi.py [SGR] [Read] django/core/asgi.py: 1 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: django/core/exceptions.py [SGR] [Read] django/core/exceptions.py: 25 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 66 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 1988ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: db [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: QuerySet [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: deferred execution [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: db - Search for 'deferred execution' in files related t [SGR] 2. grep: QuerySet - Search for 'lazy evaluation' in files related to d [SGR] 3. glob_search: N/A - Find files containing 'QuerySet' to locate the rel [SGR] 4. grep: deferred execution - Search for the term 'db' within the django/db dire [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: db - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: QuerySet - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: deferred execution - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1572ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ["Found class 'FieldFetchBlocked' in django/core/exceptions.py:135", "Found class 'ValidationError' in django/core/exceptions.py:144", "Found method '__init__' in django/core/exceptions.py:147", "Found method 'message_dict' in django/core/exceptions.py:191", "Found method 'messages' in django/core/exceptions.py:199"] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1220ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ["Found class 'FieldFetchBlocked' in django/core/exceptions.py:135", "Found class 'ValidationError' in django/core/exceptions.py:144", "Found method '__init__' in django/core/exceptions.py:147", "Found method 'message_dict' in django/core/exceptions.py:191", "Found method 'messages' in django/core/exceptions.py:199"] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 724ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 743ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ["Class 'FieldFetchBlocked' in django/core/exceptions.py", "Class 'ValidationError' in django/core/exceptions.py", "Method '__init__' in django/core/exceptions.py", "Method 'message_dict' in django/core/exceptions.py", "Method 'messages' in django/core/exceptions.py"] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 914ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 1694ms [SGR] Summary: The delayed execution of database queries in Django is a known feature. When you build a query using... [SGR] Code locations: 1 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 17479ms [SGR] LLM time: 17471ms [SGR] Tool time: 8ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 3, 'glob_search': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/django_queryset_lazy_evaluation_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/django_queryset_lazy_evaluation_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['django/db/models/query.py', 'django/db/models/query.py'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: gin_route_tree_matching Repo: gin Query: I registered /users/new before /users/:id but requests to /users/new are hitting the :id handler. Wh... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Go': 96} [SGR] Primary (detected): Go [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['binding', 'codec', 'docs', 'examples', 'ginS', 'internal', 'render', 'testdata'] [SGR] Manifests: ['go.mod', 'go.sum'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1111ms [SGR] Final Language: go [SGR] Final Framework: Gin [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['binding/', 'codec/', 'docs/', 'examples/', 'ginS/', 'internal/', 'render/', 'testdata/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1113ms [SGR] Concepts: ['route matching', 'pattern specificity', 'request routing order'] [SGR] User problem: The user expects requests to /users/new to be handled by the registration handler, but they are being routed to the /users/:id handler instead. [SGR] What to find: The code that determines how the framework matches incoming request paths to registered routes, especially in cases of overlapping patterns. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 2043ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['testdata/', 'docs/', 'examples/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['ginS'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: binding/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: codec/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: docs/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: examples/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2331ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['router', 'Route', 'Match'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['path', 'tree'] [SGR] Likely files: ['path.go'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 1 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: path.go [SGR] [Read] path.go: 3 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 3 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 3313ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: router [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: Route [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 3 [SGR] 1. grep: router - Find core routing components and their definitions [SGR] 2. grep: Route - Understand the data structure used for storing and [SGR] 3. read_file: N/A - Get a detailed understanding of the routing logic [SGR] Executing 3 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: router - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: Route - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1203ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ["Function 'cleanPath' in path.go:23", "Function 'bufApp' in path.go:128", "Function 'removeRepeatedChar' in path.go:155"] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 725ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1334ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['file_path is required'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1028ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 4105ms [SGR] Summary: The Gin framework's routing mechanism prioritizes more specific routes over less specific ones. When... [SGR] Code locations: 1 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] [Tool] read_file: path.go [SGR] [Tool] read_file: path.go [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 1 [SGR] Total iterations: 3 [SGR] Total time: 18326ms [SGR] LLM time: 18326ms [SGR] Tool time: 1ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 2, 'read_file': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/gin_route_tree_matching_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/gin_route_tree_matching_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['tree.go', 'gin.go'] Found: ['path.go'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: gin_context_pool_reuse Repo: gin Query: I spawned a goroutine from my handler and passed it the request context, but later the data in the c... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Go': 96} [SGR] Primary (detected): Go [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['binding', 'codec', 'docs', 'examples', 'ginS', 'internal', 'render', 'testdata'] [SGR] Manifests: ['go.mod', 'go.sum'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1340ms [SGR] Final Language: go [SGR] Final Framework: Gin [SGR] Final Type: web_framework [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['binding/', 'codec/', 'docs/', 'examples/', 'ginS/', 'internal/', 'render/', 'testdata/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1143ms [SGR] Concepts: ['goroutine', 'context', 'data corruption', 'background tasks'] [SGR] User problem: User is experiencing data corruption in request context when using goroutines for background tasks. [SGR] What to find: The code that handles context propagation and potential race conditions between goroutines and request contexts. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1444ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['testdata/', 'docs/', 'examples/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['ginS'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: binding/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: codec/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: docs/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: examples/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2677ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['context', 'Context', 'goroutine', 'race'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['gin', 'sync'] [SGR] Likely files: ['context.go', 'gin.go'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 2 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: context.go [SGR] [Read] context.go: 9 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR] [Read] gin.go: 3 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 12 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2424ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: context [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: Context [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: goroutine [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: context - Search for mentions of 'context' and 'goroutine' t [SGR] 2. grep: Context - Search for 'race' related to 'context' or 'gorouti [SGR] 3. grep: goroutine - Search for 'Context' (capitalized) as it might be [SGR] 4. glob_search: N/A - Find files that might be related to context handli [SGR] 5. glob_search: N/A - Find files that might be related to the gin framew [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: context - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: Context - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: goroutine - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] [Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1412ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['context.go:184: FullPath', 'context.go:195: Next', 'gin.go:60: RouteInfo', 'gin.go:68: Engine', 'gin.go:92: Engine'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 980ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['context.go:184: FullPath', 'context.go:195: Next', 'gin.go:60: RouteInfo', 'gin.go:68: Engine', 'gin.go:92: Engine'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 714ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1007ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['context.go', 'gin.go'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 831ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['gin_test.go', 'recovery.go', 'auth.go', 'logger.go', 'routes_test.go'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1079ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 2783ms [SGR] Summary: The Gin framework's `Context` object is not safe for concurrent use. If you spawn a goroutine from a... [SGR] Code locations: 2 [SGR] Confidence: high [SGR] [Tool] read_file: context.go [SGR] [Tool] read_file: context.go [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] [Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR] [Tool] read_file: gin.go [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 2 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 17856ms [SGR] LLM time: 17852ms [SGR] Tool time: 4ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 3, 'glob_search': 2} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/gin_context_pool_reuse_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/gin_context_pool_reuse_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['gin.go', 'context.go'] Found: ['context.go', 'gin.go'] Matched: ['gin.go', 'context.go'] Recall: 100% ================================================================================ Question: codeql_dataflow_configuration Repo: codeql Query: I wrote a function that validates and escapes user input but CodeQL still reports it as vulnerable. ... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 1955, 'C++': 5, 'C': 5, 'Go': 814, 'Java': 7, 'CodeQL': 2147, 'JavaScript': 12, 'Rust': 118} [SGR] Primary (detected): CodeQL [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Manifests: ['Cargo.toml', 'Cargo.lock', 'misc/legacy-support/python/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/java/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/cpp/qlpack.yml'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1515ms [SGR] [Override] Language: python → other [SGR] Final Language: other [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 896ms [SGR] Concepts: ['input validation', 'data sanitization', 'taint tracking', 'CodeQL security analysis'] [SGR] User problem: The user has a function that is supposed to validate and escape user input, but CodeQL still reports it as vulnerable. They want to know how to correctly mark their function so that CodeQL recognizes it as a source of safe data. [SGR] What to find: How to mark a custom validation function so that CodeQL recognizes it as a sanitizing function and stops flagging data flowing through it as vulnerable. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 2178ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['fixtures/', 'mocks/', 'benchmarks/', 'samples/', 'spec/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: actions [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: change-notes [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: config [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: cpp [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2849ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['validation', 'sanitization', 'taint', 'codeql', 'actions', 'ql', 'extractor'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['security', 'custom'] [SGR] Likely files: ['actions/ql/', 'cpp/ql/', 'csharp/ql/', 'go/ql/', 'java/ql/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 5 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: csharp/ql/Directory.Build.props [SGR] [Read] csharp/ql/Directory.Build.props: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: csharp/ql/paket.dependencies [SGR] [Read] csharp/ql/paket.dependencies: 0 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 0 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2315ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: validation [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: sanitization [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: validation - Search for how CodeQL uses 'taint' and 'validation [SGR] 2. grep: sanitization - Search for CodeQL's custom rules or actions relate [SGR] 3. glob_search: N/A - Find files related to CodeQL's analysis actions. [SGR] 4. glob_search: N/A - Find files related to CodeQL's QL language or extr [SGR] 5. list_dir: N/A - Get a general overview of the CodeQL directory str [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: validation - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: sanitization - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] [Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1661ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 717ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 594ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1147ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 938ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1237ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 3076ms [SGR] Summary: CodeQL's default security analysis may not automatically recognize custom validation functions. To a... [SGR] Code locations: 0 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 19853ms [SGR] LLM time: 19845ms [SGR] Tool time: 8ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 2, 'glob_search': 2, 'list_dir': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/codeql_dataflow_configuration_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/codeql_dataflow_configuration_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/dataflow/Configuration.qll', 'javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/dataflow/TaintTracking.qll', 'docs/codeql/codeql-language-guides/analyzing-data-flow-in-javascript-and-typescript.rst'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: codeql_security_query_structure Repo: codeql Query: I want to find places where data from HTTP request parameters ends up being written to the page with... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 1955, 'C++': 5, 'C': 5, 'Go': 814, 'Java': 7, 'CodeQL': 2147, 'JavaScript': 12, 'Rust': 118} [SGR] Primary (detected): CodeQL [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Manifests: ['Cargo.toml', 'Cargo.lock', 'misc/legacy-support/python/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/java/qlpack.yml', 'misc/legacy-support/cpp/qlpack.yml'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1733ms [SGR] [Override] Language: python → other [SGR] Final Language: other [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['actions', 'change-notes', 'config', 'cpp', 'csharp', 'docs', 'go', 'java', 'javascript', 'misc'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1086ms [SGR] Concepts: ['HTTP request parameters', 'unencoded output', 'data writing', 'security vulnerability', 'input to output tracing'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to find instances where data from HTTP request parameters is written to a page without proper encoding, potentially leading to security vulnerabilities. [SGR] What to find: Code that writes unencoded data from HTTP request parameters to the page. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1808ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['docs/', 'go/', 'java/', 'javascript/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: actions [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: change-notes [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: config [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: cpp [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3986ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['http', 'request', 'parameter', 'write', 'output', 'trace', 'security', 'vulnerability'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['actions', 'actions/extractor', 'config'] [SGR] Likely files: [] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2272ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: http [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: request [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: parameter [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: write [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: output [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: http - Search for occurrences of 'request' and 'parameter [SGR] 2. grep: request - Search for patterns like 'request.*parameter' to f [SGR] 3. grep: parameter - Search for terms related to writing data to the pa [SGR] 4. grep: write - Search for patterns that might indicate unencoded [SGR] 5. grep: output - Search for terms related to tracing data flow, suc [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: http - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: request - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: parameter - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: write - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: output - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 623ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 905ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 613ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1031ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 638ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1359ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 2198ms [SGR] Summary: Based on the provided search iterations, there were no findings. Therefore, I cannot provide specifi... [SGR] Code locations: 0 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 18604ms [SGR] LLM time: 18603ms [SGR] Tool time: 1ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/codeql_security_query_structure_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/codeql_security_query_structure_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/security/dataflow/DomBasedXssQuery.qll', 'javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/security/dataflow/Xss.qll', 'javascript/ql/lib/semmle/javascript/security/dataflow/ReflectedXssCustomizations.qll'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: infinigen_procedural_material_nodes Repo: infinigen Query: I want to create materials that look different each time based on a seed value - like varied wood gr... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 878, 'C++': 46, 'C': 45} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['docs', 'infinigen', 'infinigen_examples', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'pyproject.toml', 'setup.py'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1592ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen/core/', 'infinigen/datagen/', 'infinigen/terrain/', 'infinigen/tools/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_indoor/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_nature/', 'infinigen_examples/constraints/', 'infinigen_examples/util/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1079ms [SGR] Concepts: ['procedural generation', 'randomization', 'seed value', 'asset customization', 'rendering integration'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to create randomized visual effects, such as wood grain or rust, that change with each render based on a seed value. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for generating randomized appearances and how it integrates with Blender for rendering. [SGR] Question type: how_it_works [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1500ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen_examples/', 'infinigen/tools/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['infinigen/terrain', 'infinigen/datagen', 'infinigen/core'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/assets/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/core/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/datagen/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/terrain/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 5986ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['randomization', 'procedural generation', 'asset_parameters', 'generate_asset_parameters', 'generate_individual_assets', 'asset customization', 'seed'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['seed'] [SGR] Likely files: ['infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen/core/rendering/', 'infinigen_examples/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 3 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/assets/__init__.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/assets/__init__.py: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/assets/colors.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/assets/colors.py: 20 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/rendering/__init__.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/rendering/post_render.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/rendering/post_render.py: 10 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/rendering/render.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/rendering/render.py: 6 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/__init__.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/asset_parameters.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen_examples/asset_parameters.py: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/generate_asset_demo.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen_examples/generate_asset_demo.py: 4 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 40 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 20551ms [SGR] Gemini call took 1613ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: randomization [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: procedural generation [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: asset_parameters [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: randomization - Find how randomization and procedural generation a [SGR] 2. grep: procedural generation - Understand how asset parameters are managed and cu [SGR] 3. grep: asset_parameters - Investigate how the generated assets are connected [SGR] 4. glob_search: N/A - Find files that might contain the logic for genera [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: randomization - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: procedural generation - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: asset_parameters - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] glob_search: * in . [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1143ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Error: Pattern rejected: Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 968ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Error: Pattern rejected: Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 905ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Error: Pattern rejected: Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1173ms [SGR] Found relevant: True [SGR] Key findings: ['infinigen_examples/generate_asset_parameters.py', 'infinigen_examples/generate_asset_demo.py', 'infinigen_examples/asset_parameters.py'] [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1210ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 2095ms [SGR] Summary: The system uses procedural generation to create varied appearances for assets, such as wood grain or... [SGR] Code locations: 3 [SGR] Confidence: medium [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/generate_asset_parameters.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/generate_asset_parameters.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/generate_asset_demo.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/generate_asset_demo.py [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/asset_parameters.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen_examples/asset_parameters.py [SGR] [Tool] (cache hit) [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 3 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 40929ms [SGR] LLM time: 40920ms [SGR] Tool time: 9ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 3, 'glob_search': 1} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → medium Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/infinigen_procedural_material_nodes_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/infinigen_procedural_material_nodes_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['infinigen/core/nodes/node_wrangler.py', 'infinigen/core/nodes/node_utils.py', 'infinigen/core/surface.py'] Found: ['infinigen_examples/generate_asset_parameters.py', 'infinigen_examples/generate_asset_demo.py', 'infinigen_examples/asset_parameters.py'] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline Repo: infinigen Query: When generating a nature scene, objects need to be distributed realistically - grass under trees, ro... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 878, 'C++': 46, 'C': 45} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['docs', 'infinigen', 'infinigen_examples', 'scripts', 'tests'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'pyproject.toml', 'setup.py'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1954ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: Blender [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen/core/', 'infinigen/datagen/', 'infinigen/terrain/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_indoor/', 'infinigen_examples/configs_nature/', 'scripts/install/', 'scripts/launch/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1432ms [SGR] Concepts: ['spatial constraints', 'object distribution', 'realistic environment generation', 'pipeline processing', 'object density control'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to ensure that objects are placed realistically in a generated nature scene, respecting factors like gravity and terrain. [SGR] What to find: The user needs to understand how the system [SGR] Question type: how_it_works [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1615ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['infinigen/assets/', 'infinigen_examples/', 'scripts/install/', 'scripts/launch/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['infinigen/terrain', 'infinigen/datagen', 'infinigen/core'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/assets/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/core/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/datagen/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: infinigen/terrain/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3793ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['placement', 'density', 'pipeline', 'constraints', 'instance_scatter', 'simulation'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['distribution', 'processing', 'environment'] [SGR] Likely files: ['infinigen/core/placement/', 'infinigen/core/sim/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 2 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/__init__.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/placement/__init__.py: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/animation_policy.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/placement/animation_policy.py: 14 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/placement/camera.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/placement/camera.py: 11 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/sim/__init__.py [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/sim/kinematic_compiler.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/sim/kinematic_compiler.py: 9 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: infinigen/core/sim/kinematic_node.py [SGR] [Read] infinigen/core/sim/kinematic_node.py: 12 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 46 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 1828ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: placement [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: density [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: pipeline [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: constraints [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: instance_scatter [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: placement - Search for the primary term 'placement' to underst [SGR] 2. grep: density - Search for the primary term 'density' to understan [SGR] 3. grep: pipeline - Search for the primary term 'pipeline' to understa [SGR] 4. grep: constraints - Search for the primary term 'constraints' to under [SGR] 5. grep: instance_scatter - Search for the primary term 'instance_scatter' whi [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: placement - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: density - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: pipeline - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: constraints - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: instance_scatter - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1130ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1536ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 842ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Error: Pattern rejected: Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 794ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 852ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 881ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 1800ms [SGR] Summary: The provided search results do not contain specific information about how the pipeline handles spati... [SGR] Code locations: 1 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 18533ms [SGR] LLM time: 18532ms [SGR] Tool time: 1ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['infinigen/core/placement/factory.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/placement.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/density.py', 'infinigen/core/placement/instance_scatter.py'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: qgis_map_rendering_pipeline Repo: QGIS Query: When I have 10 heavy layers and pan the map, the UI stays responsive and layers appear progressively... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 3312} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['cmake', 'cmake_templates', 'debian', 'doc', 'editors', 'external', 'i18n', 'images', 'linux', 'ms-windows'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'setup.cfg', '.docker/qgis_resources/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1303ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: None [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['cmake', 'debian', 'python', 'resources'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1445ms [SGR] Concepts: ['progressive rendering', 'background processing', 'UI responsiveness', 'map layer drawing', 'drawing coordination'] [SGR] User problem: The user wants to understand how the application handles drawing many map layers without freezing the UI, specifically how it achieves responsiveness and progressive layer appearance. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for splitting up the drawing of heavy layers and coordinating background drawing. [SGR] Question type: how_it_works [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1879ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['resources/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: cmake [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: debian [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: python [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: resources [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 1382ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['processing', 'render', 'drawing', 'layer', 'coordinator'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['background', 'ui'] [SGR] Likely files: ['python/gui/', 'python/core/'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 2 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/gui/__init__.py.in [SGR] [Read] python/gui/__init__.py.in: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/gui/class_map.yaml [SGR] [Read] python/gui/class_map.yaml: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/gui/gui.sip.in [SGR] [Read] python/gui/gui.sip.in: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/core/__init__.py.in [SGR] [Read] python/core/__init__.py.in: 4 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/core/class_map.yaml [SGR] [Read] python/core/class_map.yaml: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/core/contextmanagers.py [SGR] [Read] python/core/contextmanagers.py: 1 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 5 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2113ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: processing [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: render [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: drawing [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: layer [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: coordinator [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: processing - Search for the term 'layer' to understand how laye [SGR] 2. grep: render - Search for the term 'processing' to find areas rel [SGR] 3. grep: drawing - Search for the term 'render' to find code related [SGR] 4. grep: layer - Search for the term 'drawing' to find code related [SGR] 5. grep: coordinator - Search for the term 'coordinator' to understand ho [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: processing - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: render - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: drawing - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: layer - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: coordinator - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 703ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 539ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 853ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1627ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ["'_datetime_range_repr' in python/core/__init__.py.in:64", "'_date_range_repr' in python/core/__init__.py.in:68", "'_processing_source_repr' in python/core/__init__.py.in:134", "'_processing_output_layer_repr' in python/core/__init__.py.in:143", "'qgisapp' in python/core/contextmanagers.py:28"] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 982ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1092ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 2538ms [SGR] Summary: The provided search results do not contain information about how the application splits up the drawi... [SGR] Code locations: 1 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 16836ms [SGR] LLM time: 16835ms [SGR] Tool time: 1ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/qgis_map_rendering_pipeline_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/qgis_map_rendering_pipeline_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/core/maprenderer/qgsmaprendererparalleljob.cpp', 'src/core/maprenderer/qgsmaprendererjob.cpp', 'src/gui/qgsmapcanvas.cpp'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: qgis_expression_evaluation Repo: QGIS Query: I have a complex formula in my label settings that calculates text from multiple fields and geometry... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'Python': 3312} [SGR] Primary (detected): Python [SGR] Framework (detected): None [SGR] Top dirs: ['cmake', 'cmake_templates', 'debian', 'doc', 'editors', 'external', 'i18n', 'images', 'linux', 'ms-windows'] [SGR] Manifests: ['requirements.txt', 'setup.cfg', '.docker/qgis_resources/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 2081ms [SGR] Final Language: python [SGR] Final Framework: PyQt [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['cmake/', 'debian/', 'python/', 'resources/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 1119ms [SGR] Concepts: ['formula calculation', 'performance optimization', 'label settings', 'data rendering'] [SGR] User problem: The user is experiencing slow rendering performance on large datasets due to a complex formula used in label settings. [SGR] What to find: The code responsible for calculating the formula in label settings and potential areas for optimization. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1058ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['resources/', 'debian/', 'cmake/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['python'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: cmake/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: debian/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: python/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: resources/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 2513ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['qgis_core', 'qgis_gui', 'qgis_customwidgets', 'sip'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['calculations', 'optimization', 'rendering', 'label'] [SGR] Likely files: ['python/core/', 'python/gui/', 'python/custom_widgets/', 'cmake/FindSIP.py', 'cmake/FindSIP.cmake'] [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 5 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/core/__init__.py.in [SGR] [Read] python/core/__init__.py.in: 4 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/core/class_map.yaml [SGR] [Read] python/core/class_map.yaml: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/core/contextmanagers.py [SGR] [Read] python/core/contextmanagers.py: 1 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/gui/__init__.py.in [SGR] [Read] python/gui/__init__.py.in: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/gui/class_map.yaml [SGR] [Read] python/gui/class_map.yaml: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/gui/gui.sip.in [SGR] [Read] python/gui/gui.sip.in: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: python/custom_widgets/qgis_customwidgets.py [SGR] [Read] python/custom_widgets/qgis_customwidgets.py: 1 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: cmake/FindSIP.py [SGR] [Read] cmake/FindSIP.py: 0 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: cmake/FindSIP.cmake [SGR] [Read] cmake/FindSIP.cmake: 0 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 6 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 3589ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: qgis_core [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: qgis_gui [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: qgis_customwidgets [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: sip [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 4 [SGR] 1. grep: qgis_core - Search for the primary term 'qgis_core' to underst [SGR] 2. grep: qgis_gui - Search for the primary term 'qgis_gui' to find any [SGR] 3. grep: qgis_customwidgets - Search for the term 'calculations' in conjunction [SGR] 4. grep: sip - Search for 'optimization' and 'rendering' to find [SGR] Executing 4 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: qgis_core - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: qgis_gui - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: qgis_customwidgets - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: sip - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1068ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Error: Pattern rejected: Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 892ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 734ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ["'qgis_customwidgets' pattern was too broad and rejected"] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 758ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Error: Pattern rejected: Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1100ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 2619ms [SGR] Summary: The provided search results do not contain information about where complex formula calculations for ... [SGR] Code locations: 0 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 4 [SGR] Total time: 17920ms [SGR] LLM time: 17919ms [SGR] Tool time: 1ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 4} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/qgis_expression_evaluation_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/qgis_expression_evaluation_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/core/expression/qgsexpression.cpp', 'src/core/qgsexpressioncontext.h', 'src/core/labeling/qgspallabeling.cpp'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: claude_flow_agent_coordination Repo: claude-flow Query: I started multiple workers to process different parts of a project but two of them tried to modify t... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 1154, 'Python': 210, 'TypeScript': 464} [SGR] Primary (detected): JavaScript [SGR] Framework (detected): Express [SGR] Top dirs: ['analysis-reports', 'assets', 'benchmark', 'bin', 'claude-flow-wiki', 'dist-cjs', 'docker', 'docker-test', 'docs', 'examples'] [SGR] Manifests: ['package-lock.json', 'package.json', 'benchmark/requirements.txt', 'benchmark/setup.py', 'benchmark/hive-mind-benchmarks/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1135ms [SGR] Final Language: javascript [SGR] Final Framework: Express [SGR] Final Type: other [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['benchmark/', 'bin/', 'docker/', 'examples/', 'hooks/', 'models/', 'scripts/', 'src/'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 695ms [SGR] Concepts: ['concurrency control', 'file locking', 'inter-process communication', 'resource contention'] [SGR] User problem: Prevent multiple workers from modifying the same file simultaneously to avoid data corruption. [SGR] What to find: Code that implements locking mechanisms or inter-worker communication for file access. [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 1695ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['scripts/', 'examples/', 'models/', 'hooks/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: [] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: benchmark/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: bin/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: docker/ [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: examples/ [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 3048ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['coordination', 'concurrent-display.js', 'coordinator.js'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['worker', 'process'] [SGR] Likely files: [] [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 1306ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: coordination [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: concurrent-display.js [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: coordinator.js [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: worker [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: process [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: coordination - Search for the primary term 'coordination' to find [SGR] 2. grep: concurrent-display.js - Search for 'concurrent-display.js' to find files r [SGR] 3. grep: coordinator.js - Search for 'coordinator.js' to find files related [SGR] 4. grep: worker - Search for patterns related to file locking to und [SGR] 5. grep: process - Search for patterns related to concurrency to unde [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: coordination - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: concurrent-display.js - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: coordinator.js - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: worker - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: process - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 956ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 786ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 787ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1218ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 712ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: [] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 725ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 1177ms [SGR] Summary: The search did not yield any specific code related to coordinating multiple workers or preventing fi... [SGR] Code locations: 0 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 18162ms [SGR] LLM time: 18160ms [SGR] Tool time: 1ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/claude_flow_agent_coordination_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/claude_flow_agent_coordination_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/task/coordination.ts', 'src/cli/simple-commands/inject-memory-protocol.js', 'src/resources/resource-manager.ts'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ Question: claude_flow_memory_system Repo: claude-flow Query: My AI assistant learned my coding preferences during our session but after restarting it forgot ever... ================================================================================ [SGR] Step 0: Analyzing repository context (smart)... [SGR] [Tool] analyze_repo_smart: scanning repository... [SGR] Languages found: {'JavaScript': 1154, 'Python': 210, 'TypeScript': 464} [SGR] Primary (detected): JavaScript [SGR] Framework (detected): Express [SGR] Top dirs: ['analysis-reports', 'assets', 'benchmark', 'bin', 'claude-flow-wiki', 'dist-cjs', 'docker', 'docker-test', 'docs', 'examples'] [SGR] Manifests: ['package-lock.json', 'package.json', 'benchmark/requirements.txt', 'benchmark/setup.py', 'benchmark/hive-mind-benchmarks/requirements.txt'] [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] Gemini call took 1207ms [SGR] Final Language: javascript [SGR] Final Framework: Express [SGR] Final Type: library [SGR] Final Key dirs: ['benchmark', 'bin', 'docker', 'docs', 'examples', 'hooks', 'models', 'scripts', 'src'] [SGR] Step 1: Analyzing question concepts... [SGR] Gemini call took 748ms [SGR] Concepts: ['persistence', 'serialization', 'state saving', 'configuration management'] [SGR] User problem: The user's AI assistant forgets learned preferences after restarting and they want to make this information persistent. [SGR] What to find: the code responsible for saving and loading the AI assistant's learned preferences [SGR] Question type: debugging [SGR] Step 1.5: Determining search scope... [SGR] Gemini call took 2823ms [SGR] Question focus: implementation [SGR] Exclude dirs: ['__pycache__/', 'node_modules/', 'build/', 'bin/', '__pypackages__/']... [SGR] Focus dirs: ['models', 'src'] [SGR] Step 2: Extracting technical terms... [SGR] Exploring actual directory structure... [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: . [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: benchmark [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: bin [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: docker [SGR] [Tool] list_dir: docs [SGR] Explored 4 key directories [SGR] Gemini call took 5106ms [SGR] Primary terms: ['persistence', 'serialization', 'state saving', 'configuration management', 'config', 'memory', 'auto-save'] [SGR] Secondary terms: ['persistence', 'state'] [SGR] Likely files: ['bin/config.js', 'bin/memory.js', 'hive-mind/auto-save-middleware.js', 'hive-mind/memory.js'] [SGR] [Path validation] Removed 2 invalid paths: ['hive-mind/auto-save-middleware.js', 'hive-mind/memory.js']... [SGR] Step 2.5: Reading 2 likely files... [SGR] [Tool] read_file: bin/config.js [SGR] [Read] bin/config.js: 4 definitions found [SGR] [Tool] read_file: bin/memory.js [SGR] [Read] bin/memory.js: 4 definitions found [SGR] Extracted 8 findings from likely files [SGR] Step 3: Creating search plan... [SGR] Gemini call took 2958ms [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: persistence [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: serialization [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: state saving [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: configuration management [SGR] [Fallback] Set grep pattern to: config [SGR] Strategy: keyword_hunt [SGR] Actions: 5 [SGR] 1. grep: persistence - Search for the term 'persistence' in files to unde [SGR] 2. grep: serialization - Search for the term 'serialization' to find out ho [SGR] 3. grep: state saving - Search for 'state saving' to locate functions or l [SGR] 4. grep: configuration management - Search for 'configuration management' or 'config' [SGR] 5. grep: config - Search for 'auto-save' to identify any automatic s [SGR] Executing 5 initial actions in parallel... [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: persistence - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: serialization - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: state saving - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: configuration management - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] [Tool] Pattern validation failed: config - Pattern matches everything - too broad [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1289ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 794ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 783ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 1311ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Error: Pattern rejected: Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Step 3: Interpreting result... [SGR] Gemini call took 2022ms [SGR] Found relevant: False [SGR] Key findings: ['Error: Pattern rejected: Pattern matches everything - too broad'] [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Need more: True [SGR] Gemini call took 1093ms [SGR] LLM decided to stop: [SGR] Step 5: Generating final answer... [SGR] Gemini call took 629ms [SGR] Summary: The AI assistant... [SGR] Code locations: 0 [SGR] Confidence: low [SGR] Search complete: [SGR] Items found: 0 [SGR] Total iterations: 5 [SGR] Total time: 20992ms [SGR] LLM time: 20991ms [SGR] Tool time: 1ms [SGR] Tools used: {'grep': 5} [SGR] Confidence progression: low → low → low → low → low Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/claude_flow_memory_system_detailed.json /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/claude_flow_memory_system_steps.md --- RESULTS --- Expected: ['src/swarm/memory.ts', 'src/core/DatabaseManager.ts', 'src/cli/simple-commands/init/templates/memory-bank-md.js'] Found: [] Matched: [] Recall: 0% ================================================================================ SUMMARY ================================================================================ django_request_response_lifecycle: ERROR - None django_queryset_lazy_evaluation: ERROR - None gin_route_tree_matching: ERROR - None gin_context_pool_reuse: recall=100%, time=17856ms codeql_dataflow_configuration: ERROR - None codeql_security_query_structure: ERROR - None infinigen_procedural_material_nodes: ERROR - None infinigen_asset_placement_pipeline: ERROR - None qgis_map_rendering_pipeline: ERROR - None qgis_expression_evaluation: ERROR - None claude_flow_agent_coordination: ERROR - None claude_flow_memory_system: ERROR - None Successful: 1/12 Average recall: 100% Average time: 17856ms Logs saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332 Comparison report saved to: /Users/mix0z/PycharmProjects/Semantic-Search-MCP/logs/sgr_runs/20251207_154332/comparison_report.md