Gemini MCP Server

#!/usr/bin/env python3 """ Cross-Tool Continuation Test Tests comprehensive cross-tool continuation scenarios to ensure conversation context is maintained when switching between different tools. """ from .conversation_base_test import ConversationBaseTest class CrossToolContinuationTest(ConversationBaseTest): """Test comprehensive cross-tool continuation scenarios""" @property def test_name(self) -> str: return "cross_tool_continuation" @property def test_description(self) -> str: return "Cross-tool conversation continuation scenarios" def run_test(self) -> bool: """Test comprehensive cross-tool continuation scenarios""" try: self.logger.info("🔧 Test: Cross-tool continuation scenarios") # Setup test environment for conversation testing self.setUp() success_count = 0 total_scenarios = 3 # Scenario 1: chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview if self._test_chat_thinkdeep_codereview(): success_count += 1 # Scenario 2: analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep if self._test_analyze_debug_thinkdeep(): success_count += 1 # Scenario 3: Multi-file cross-tool continuation if self._test_multi_file_continuation(): success_count += 1 self.logger.info( f" ✅ Cross-tool continuation scenarios completed: {success_count}/{total_scenarios} scenarios passed" ) # Consider successful if at least one scenario worked return success_count > 0 except Exception as e: self.logger.error(f"Cross-tool continuation test failed: {e}") return False finally: self.cleanup_test_files() def _test_chat_thinkdeep_codereview(self) -> bool: """Test chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview scenario""" try: self.logger.info(" 1: Testing chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview") # Start with chat chat_response, chat_id = self.call_mcp_tool( "chat", { "prompt": "Please use low thinking mode. Look at this Python code and tell me what you think about it", "files": [self.test_files["python"]], "model": "flash", }, ) if not chat_response or not chat_id: self.logger.error("Failed to start chat conversation") return False # Continue with thinkdeep thinkdeep_response, _ = self.call_mcp_tool( "thinkdeep", { "step": "Think deeply about potential performance issues in this code. Please use low thinking mode.", "step_number": 1, "total_steps": 1, "next_step_required": False, "findings": "Building on previous chat analysis to examine performance issues", "relevant_files": [self.test_files["python"]], # Same file should be deduplicated "continuation_id": chat_id, "model": "flash", }, ) if not thinkdeep_response: self.logger.error("Failed chat -> thinkdeep continuation") return False # Continue with codereview codereview_response, _ = self.call_mcp_tool( "codereview", { "step": "Building on our previous analysis, provide a comprehensive code review", "step_number": 1, "total_steps": 1, "next_step_required": False, "findings": "Continuing from previous chat and thinkdeep analysis for comprehensive review", "relevant_files": [self.test_files["python"]], # Same file should be deduplicated "continuation_id": chat_id, "model": "flash", }, ) if not codereview_response: self.logger.error("Failed thinkdeep -> codereview continuation") return False self.logger.info(" ✅ chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview working") return True except Exception as e: self.logger.error(f"Chat -> thinkdeep -> codereview scenario failed: {e}") return False def _test_analyze_debug_thinkdeep(self) -> bool: """Test analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep scenario""" try: self.logger.info(" 2: Testing analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep") # Start with analyze analyze_response, analyze_id = self.call_mcp_tool( "analyze", { "step": "Analyze this code for quality and performance issues", "step_number": 1, "total_steps": 1, "next_step_required": False, "findings": "Starting analysis of Python code for quality and performance issues", "relevant_files": [self.test_files["python"]], "model": "flash", }, ) if not analyze_response or not analyze_id: self.logger.warning("Failed to start analyze conversation, skipping scenario 2") return False # Continue with debug debug_response, _ = self.call_mcp_tool( "debug", { "step": "Based on our analysis, help debug the performance issue in fibonacci", "step_number": 1, "total_steps": 1, "next_step_required": False, "findings": "Building on previous analysis to debug specific performance issue", "relevant_files": [self.test_files["python"]], # Same file should be deduplicated "continuation_id": analyze_id, "model": "flash", }, ) if not debug_response: self.logger.warning(" ⚠️ analyze -> debug continuation failed") return False # Continue with thinkdeep final_response, _ = self.call_mcp_tool( "thinkdeep", { "step": "Think deeply about the architectural implications of the issues we've found. Please use low thinking mode.", "step_number": 1, "total_steps": 1, "next_step_required": False, "findings": "Building on analysis and debug findings to explore architectural implications", "relevant_files": [self.test_files["python"]], # Same file should be deduplicated "continuation_id": analyze_id, "model": "flash", }, ) if not final_response: self.logger.warning(" ⚠️ debug -> thinkdeep continuation failed") return False self.logger.info(" ✅ analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep working") return True except Exception as e: self.logger.error(f"Analyze -> debug -> thinkdeep scenario failed: {e}") return False def _test_multi_file_continuation(self) -> bool: """Test multi-file cross-tool continuation""" try: self.logger.info(" 3: Testing multi-file cross-tool continuation") # Start with both files multi_response, multi_id = self.call_mcp_tool( "chat", { "prompt": "Please use low thinking mode. Analyze both the Python code and configuration file", "files": [self.test_files["python"], self.test_files["config"]], "model": "flash", }, ) if not multi_response or not multi_id: self.logger.warning("Failed to start multi-file conversation, skipping scenario 3") return False # Switch to codereview with same files (should use conversation history) multi_review, _ = self.call_mcp_tool( "codereview", { "step": "Review both files in the context of our previous discussion", "step_number": 1, "total_steps": 1, "next_step_required": False, "findings": "Continuing multi-file analysis with code review perspective", "relevant_files": [self.test_files["python"], self.test_files["config"]], # Same files "continuation_id": multi_id, "model": "flash", }, ) if not multi_review: self.logger.warning(" ⚠️ Multi-file cross-tool continuation failed") return False self.logger.info(" ✅ Multi-file cross-tool continuation working") return True except Exception as e: self.logger.error(f"Multi-file continuation scenario failed: {e}") return False