browser_resume_clock

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It merely states the action without explaining what resuming the clock does, any side effects, or whether it affects page timers or other time-related features.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely terse, consisting of a single phrase. While brief, it is under-specified rather than concise, as it omits essential context and does not earn its place as a useful explanation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simple structure (no parameters, no output schema), the description still fails to provide adequate context. It does not explain the purpose relative to sibling clock tools, the expected state of the browser, or any behavioral consequences.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

This tool has zero parameters, and the schema coverage is 100% vacuously. The description adds no parameter information, but with no parameters to document, the baseline score of 4 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description '恢复时钟' is a direct Chinese translation of the tool name 'browser_resume_clock', restating it without adding any distinguishing information. It does not clarify what 'resume clock' means in the browser context or how it differs from sibling tools like browser_pause_clock or browser_fast_forward.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description offers no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, such as requiring a paused clock, or typical scenarios, leaving the agent with no basis for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.